Zolmitriptan compared to propranolol in the treatment of acute neuroleptic-induced akathisia: A comparative double-blind study

Ayelet Avital*, Ruth Gross-Isseroff, Rafael Stryjer, Haggai Hermesh, Abraham Weizman, Roni Shiloh

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

Neuroleptic-induced akathisia (NIA) is a common, sometimes incapacitating adverse effect of anti-psychotic medication. Zolmitriptan is a selective 5-HT1D agonist. We aimed to determine its anti-NIA efficacy in comparison to propranolol. Thirty-three neuroleptic-treated patients were randomly allocated in a double-blind design to receive either 7.5 mg/d of zolmitriptan or 120 mg/d of propranolol for 3 consecutive days, followed by 3 days without any anti-NIA treatment. Patients were assessed at baseline and on days 3 and 7 by the Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS), PANSS, HAMD, HAMA, Pulse, and Blood Pressure. Both groups showed improvement of akathisia (BARS) along the treatment period, with significant effect for time but not for group. No significant differences were found between the groups in all other measurements. Taken together, zolmitriptan was found to be as effective as propranolol for the treatment of NIA. Further placebo-controlled studies are warranted.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)476-482
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Neuropsychopharmacology
Volume19
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2009

Keywords

  • Neuroleptic-induced akathisia (NIA)
  • Propranolol
  • Serotonin
  • Zolmitriptan

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Zolmitriptan compared to propranolol in the treatment of acute neuroleptic-induced akathisia: A comparative double-blind study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this