TY - JOUR
T1 - Young men undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft and anteromedial drilling outperform at 5- to 10-year follow-up in terms of graft stability and activity levels compared to those undergoing reconstruction with hamstring autograft and transtibial drilling
AU - Hetsroni, Iftach
AU - Mann, Gideon
AU - Arami, Eyal
AU - van Stee, Mischa
AU - Marom, Niv
AU - Ohana, Nissim
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/8
Y1 - 2024/8
N2 - Objective: To compare 5- to 10-year outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in young men performed with bone-patellar tendon bone (BPTB) autograft and anteromedial portal to reconstruction with hamstring autograft and transtibial technique. It was hypothesised that in young adult men, at 5- to 10-year follow-up, superior restoration of knee laxity and activity levels would be demonstrated using BPTB autograft and anteromedial portal technique. Methods: Ninety-four men who had ACL reconstruction with BPTB autograft and anteromedial portal were eligible for comparison to 106 men who had reconstruction with hamstring autograft and transtibial technique. Inclusion criteria were: (1) age 18–35 years, (2) ACL tear caused by sports trauma only, (3) no concomitant ligament reconstruction and (4) 5- to 10-year follow-up. Outcome measures compared between the two groups included Lachman and pivot shift tests, KT side-to-side difference, Tegner and Marx scores, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC)-subjective score, Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Scale (KOOS), Short Form (SF)-36, and single hop test for distance. P value < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. Results: Forty-five patients with BPTB and 55 patients with hamstring ACL reconstruction were available for in-person assessment at 5–10 years after surgery. Outcomes in the BPTB group compared to the hamstring group showed KT difference 1.4 ± 1.9 mm vs. 2.8 ± 2.3 mm (p < 0.01), pivot shift grade 2–3 in 4% vs. 34% (p < 0.01), return to preinjury Tegner level in 51% vs. 36% (p = 0.1) and to preinjury Marx score in 29% vs. 11% (p = 0.02), and IKDC-subjective 88 ± 10 vs. 82 ± 13 vs (p < 0.01), respectively. Statistically significant inter-relationships were found between KT side-to-side difference and the Tegner, Marx and IKDC-subjective scores at follow-up (r = −0.314, p < 0.01; r = −0.263, p < 0.01; r = −0.218, p = 0.03, respectively). Conclusion: Young men undergoing ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft and anteromedial drilling outperform at 5- to 10-year follow-up in terms of graft stability and activity levels compared to young men undergoing reconstruction with hamstring autograft and transtibial drilling. Level of Evidence: III (Retrospective cross-sectional comparative study).
AB - Objective: To compare 5- to 10-year outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in young men performed with bone-patellar tendon bone (BPTB) autograft and anteromedial portal to reconstruction with hamstring autograft and transtibial technique. It was hypothesised that in young adult men, at 5- to 10-year follow-up, superior restoration of knee laxity and activity levels would be demonstrated using BPTB autograft and anteromedial portal technique. Methods: Ninety-four men who had ACL reconstruction with BPTB autograft and anteromedial portal were eligible for comparison to 106 men who had reconstruction with hamstring autograft and transtibial technique. Inclusion criteria were: (1) age 18–35 years, (2) ACL tear caused by sports trauma only, (3) no concomitant ligament reconstruction and (4) 5- to 10-year follow-up. Outcome measures compared between the two groups included Lachman and pivot shift tests, KT side-to-side difference, Tegner and Marx scores, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC)-subjective score, Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Scale (KOOS), Short Form (SF)-36, and single hop test for distance. P value < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. Results: Forty-five patients with BPTB and 55 patients with hamstring ACL reconstruction were available for in-person assessment at 5–10 years after surgery. Outcomes in the BPTB group compared to the hamstring group showed KT difference 1.4 ± 1.9 mm vs. 2.8 ± 2.3 mm (p < 0.01), pivot shift grade 2–3 in 4% vs. 34% (p < 0.01), return to preinjury Tegner level in 51% vs. 36% (p = 0.1) and to preinjury Marx score in 29% vs. 11% (p = 0.02), and IKDC-subjective 88 ± 10 vs. 82 ± 13 vs (p < 0.01), respectively. Statistically significant inter-relationships were found between KT side-to-side difference and the Tegner, Marx and IKDC-subjective scores at follow-up (r = −0.314, p < 0.01; r = −0.263, p < 0.01; r = −0.218, p = 0.03, respectively). Conclusion: Young men undergoing ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft and anteromedial drilling outperform at 5- to 10-year follow-up in terms of graft stability and activity levels compared to young men undergoing reconstruction with hamstring autograft and transtibial drilling. Level of Evidence: III (Retrospective cross-sectional comparative study).
KW - ACL
KW - Anteromedial
KW - BPTB
KW - Hamstring
KW - KT
KW - Marx score
KW - Transtibial
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85191820460&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jisako.2024.04.001
DO - 10.1016/j.jisako.2024.04.001
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 38580054
AN - SCOPUS:85191820460
SN - 2059-7754
VL - 9
SP - 540
EP - 548
JO - Journal of ISAKOS
JF - Journal of ISAKOS
IS - 4
ER -