Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Worse prognosis of local and locally advanced head and neck Merkel cell carcinoma: Is it time to change the treatment paradigm?

  • Ronen Brenner
  • , Hanna T. Frumin Edri
  • , Ina Sarel
  • , Anna Levko
  • , Sofiia Turaieva
  • , Tanzilya Tairov
  • , Ilia Berezhnov
  • , Shlomit Fenig
  • , Eyal Fenig
  • , Tomer Ziv-Baran
  • , Alexander Yakobson
  • , Walid Shalata*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Edith Wolfson Medical Center Israel
  • NurExone Biologic Ltd
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem
  • Rabin Medical Center Israel
  • Soroka Medical Center
  • Ben-Gurion University of the Negev

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive neuroendocrine skin cancer with high metastatic potential. The impact of primary tumor location on survival outcomes for local and locally advanced disease remains incompletely understood, particularly regarding the influence of chronic sun exposure. Objective: To investigate the association between primary tumor location and overall survival in patients with local and locally advanced MCC, and explore the newer implications for treatment strategy. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis of Israeli patients with non-metastatic MCC with long-term follow-up. Overall survival was assessed by primary tumor location (head and neck versus other sites) using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, gender, and TNM stage. Results: In total, 191 patients with local and locally advanced MCC were included, of whom 64 had head and neck MCC and 127 had MCC at other anatomical sites. Primary tumors located in the head and neck region were associated with significantly worse 5-year overall survival (51.6%) compared to other anatomical sites combined (65.2%, p = 0.025). In multivariate analysis, head and neck locations were associated with a significantly increased mortality risk (HR = 1.769, 95% CI: 1.104–2.835, p = 0.018) after controlling for age, gender, and TNM stage. Conclusion: Local and locally advanced head and neck MCC carries a significantly worse prognosis compared to MCC at other anatomical sites. Recent evidence of favorable responses to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in MCC, coupled with our findings, suggests that patients with head and neck disease may be appropriate candidates for this novel treatment approach. A paradigm shift toward neoadjuvant immunotherapy, especially for head and neck MCC, warrants serious consideration.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1691000
JournalFrontiers in Immunology
Volume16
DOIs
StatePublished - 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Merkel cell carcinoma
  • Merkel cell polyomavirus
  • head and neck
  • neoadjuvant immunotherapy
  • prognosis
  • survival analyses
  • treatment paradigm

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Worse prognosis of local and locally advanced head and neck Merkel cell carcinoma: Is it time to change the treatment paradigm?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this