TY - JOUR
T1 - Why did rich families increase their fertility? Inequality and marketization of child care
AU - Bar, Michael
AU - Hazan, Moshe
AU - Leukhina, Oksana
AU - Weiss, David
AU - Zoabi, Hosny
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2018/12/1
Y1 - 2018/12/1
N2 - A negative relationship between income and fertility has persisted for so long that its existence is often taken for granted. One economic theory builds on this relationship and argues that rising inequality leads to greater differential fertility between rich and poor. We show that the relationship between income and fertility has flattened between 1980 and 2010 in the US, a time of increasing inequality, as high income families increased their fertility. These facts challenge the standard theory. We propose that marketization of parental time costs can explain the changing relationship between income and fertility. We show this result both theoretically and quantitatively, after disciplining the model on US data. We explore implications of changing differential fertility for aggregate human capital. Additionally, policies, such as the minimum wage, that affect the cost of marketization, have a negative effect on the fertility and labor supply of high income women. We end by discussing the insights of this theory to the economics of marital sorting.
AB - A negative relationship between income and fertility has persisted for so long that its existence is often taken for granted. One economic theory builds on this relationship and argues that rising inequality leads to greater differential fertility between rich and poor. We show that the relationship between income and fertility has flattened between 1980 and 2010 in the US, a time of increasing inequality, as high income families increased their fertility. These facts challenge the standard theory. We propose that marketization of parental time costs can explain the changing relationship between income and fertility. We show this result both theoretically and quantitatively, after disciplining the model on US data. We explore implications of changing differential fertility for aggregate human capital. Additionally, policies, such as the minimum wage, that affect the cost of marketization, have a negative effect on the fertility and labor supply of high income women. We end by discussing the insights of this theory to the economics of marital sorting.
KW - Differential fertility
KW - Human capital
KW - Income inequality
KW - Marketization
KW - Minimum wage
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056344238&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10887-018-9160-8
DO - 10.1007/s10887-018-9160-8
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85056344238
SN - 1381-4338
VL - 23
SP - 427
EP - 463
JO - Journal of Economic Growth
JF - Journal of Economic Growth
IS - 4
ER -