Why cognitivism?

  • Yair Levy*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Intention Cognitivism–the doctrine that intending to V entails, or even consists in, believing that one will V–is an important position with potentially wide-ranging implications, such as a revisionary understanding of practical reason, and a vindicating explanation of ‘Practical Knowledge.’ In this paper, I critically examine the standard arguments adduced in support of IC, including arguments from the parity of expression of intention and belief; from the ability to plan around one’s intention; and from the explanation provided by the thesis for our knowledge of our intentional acts. I conclude that none of these arguments are compelling, and therefore that no good reason has been given to accept IC.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)223-244
Number of pages22
JournalCanadian Journal of Philosophy
Volume48
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 4 Mar 2018

Funding

FundersFunder number
UK Research and Innovation
Arts and Humanities Research CouncilAH/K008188/1

    Keywords

    • Intention
    • avowals
    • cognitivism about intention
    • practical knowledge

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Why cognitivism?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this