TY - JOUR
T1 - Which endotracheal tube location minimises the device-related pressure ulcer risk
T2 - The centre or a corner of the mouth?
AU - Amrani, Golan
AU - Gefen, Amit
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2020/4/1
Y1 - 2020/4/1
N2 - The use of an endotracheal tube (ETT), which is required for any mechanical ventilation procedure, involves an inherent risk for facial skin, lip, and mucosal pressure ulcers. The ETT is one of the most common devices associated with medical device-related pressure ulcers (MDRPUs) among surgical and intensive care unit patients. In the present work, we investigated, for the first time in the literature, the biomechanical effects of the presence and positioning of an ETT in the mouth on lip, mucosal and surrounding facial skin loads. Using two anatomically realistic finite element model variants, two ETT locations were simulated and compared, at the centre versus the corner of the mouth. Our study shows that a central location of the ETT inflicted greater lip and mucosal stress values, but a corner location caused a more widespread and diffused lip, mucosal and facial skin stress exposure. Accordingly, we cannot recommend a “safer” location for ETTs in the mouth; additional preventative measures such as dedicated dressing materials or special cushioning pads applied prophylactically, should be developed to protect from MDRPUs associated with ETT usage. The present modelling framework can be used to study the biomechanical efficacy of such protective technologies, and can therefore aid in the prevention of ETT-caused MDRPUs.
AB - The use of an endotracheal tube (ETT), which is required for any mechanical ventilation procedure, involves an inherent risk for facial skin, lip, and mucosal pressure ulcers. The ETT is one of the most common devices associated with medical device-related pressure ulcers (MDRPUs) among surgical and intensive care unit patients. In the present work, we investigated, for the first time in the literature, the biomechanical effects of the presence and positioning of an ETT in the mouth on lip, mucosal and surrounding facial skin loads. Using two anatomically realistic finite element model variants, two ETT locations were simulated and compared, at the centre versus the corner of the mouth. Our study shows that a central location of the ETT inflicted greater lip and mucosal stress values, but a corner location caused a more widespread and diffused lip, mucosal and facial skin stress exposure. Accordingly, we cannot recommend a “safer” location for ETTs in the mouth; additional preventative measures such as dedicated dressing materials or special cushioning pads applied prophylactically, should be developed to protect from MDRPUs associated with ETT usage. The present modelling framework can be used to study the biomechanical efficacy of such protective technologies, and can therefore aid in the prevention of ETT-caused MDRPUs.
KW - endotracheal tube
KW - finite element modelling
KW - medical device-related pressure ulcer
KW - pressure injury
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075216394&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/iwj.13267
DO - 10.1111/iwj.13267
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 31724822
AN - SCOPUS:85075216394
SN - 1742-4801
VL - 17
SP - 268
EP - 276
JO - International Wound Journal
JF - International Wound Journal
IS - 2
ER -