Which endotracheal tube location minimises the device-related pressure ulcer risk: The centre or a corner of the mouth?

Golan Amrani, Amit Gefen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The use of an endotracheal tube (ETT), which is required for any mechanical ventilation procedure, involves an inherent risk for facial skin, lip, and mucosal pressure ulcers. The ETT is one of the most common devices associated with medical device-related pressure ulcers (MDRPUs) among surgical and intensive care unit patients. In the present work, we investigated, for the first time in the literature, the biomechanical effects of the presence and positioning of an ETT in the mouth on lip, mucosal and surrounding facial skin loads. Using two anatomically realistic finite element model variants, two ETT locations were simulated and compared, at the centre versus the corner of the mouth. Our study shows that a central location of the ETT inflicted greater lip and mucosal stress values, but a corner location caused a more widespread and diffused lip, mucosal and facial skin stress exposure. Accordingly, we cannot recommend a “safer” location for ETTs in the mouth; additional preventative measures such as dedicated dressing materials or special cushioning pads applied prophylactically, should be developed to protect from MDRPUs associated with ETT usage. The present modelling framework can be used to study the biomechanical efficacy of such protective technologies, and can therefore aid in the prevention of ETT-caused MDRPUs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)268-276
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Wound Journal
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Apr 2020

Keywords

  • endotracheal tube
  • finite element modelling
  • medical device-related pressure ulcer
  • pressure injury

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Which endotracheal tube location minimises the device-related pressure ulcer risk: The centre or a corner of the mouth?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this