When standards are wide of the mark: Nonselective superiority and inferiority biases in comparative judgments of objects and concepts

Eilath E. Giladi*, Yechiel Klar

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

63 Scopus citations

Abstract

People are frequently required to judge how particular group members measure up against others in their group. According to the local-comparisons - general-standards (LOGE) approach, in these member-to-group comparisons, people fail to use the normatively appropriate local (group) standard and are infelicitously affected by a more general standard (involving instances from outside the judged group). Within positive groups, target group members are judged superior to the other members of the group, and within negative groups, inferior. To date, these nonselective superiority and inferiority biases have been demonstrated solely in judgments about human beings. In 6 experiments, nonselective biases were found in perceptual, affective, and cognitive judgments of nonhuman targets, objects, and concepts, thus supporting a cognitive rather than a social account.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)538-551
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: General
Volume131
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2002

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When standards are wide of the mark: Nonselective superiority and inferiority biases in comparative judgments of objects and concepts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this