TY - JOUR
T1 - When Buddhist vipassanā travels to Jewish West Bank settlements
T2 - openness without cosmopolitanism
AU - Mautner, Ori
AU - Mizrachi, Nissim
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2020/5/27
Y1 - 2020/5/27
N2 - Insight meditation (vipassanā) originated in Theravāda Buddhism. However, participants in a “Jewish Vipassanā” meditation retreat–held at a Jewish settlement in the West Bank region controlled by Israel since 1967–often depicted vipassanā as essentially Jewish. Indeed, to validate their adoption of insight meditation, many participants first needed to establish their exclusive commitment to orthodox Judaism. Consequently, they culturally appropriated vipassanā, decoupling this practice from “religious” Buddhist elements and instead depicting it as “theirs”. While this appropriation entailed significant dimensions of openness to cultural otherness, including an appreciation of “eastern” expertise in meditation, it would be difficult to characterize it as “cosmopolitan”. Rather, in this case openness ironically depended on, and resulted in deepening, meditators’ belief in the superiority of national-religious Judaism. Thus, far from being identical to openness, cosmopolitan attitudes may actually preclude openness in settings that emphasize an exclusive commitment to a single tradition. Theoretical implications are discussed.
AB - Insight meditation (vipassanā) originated in Theravāda Buddhism. However, participants in a “Jewish Vipassanā” meditation retreat–held at a Jewish settlement in the West Bank region controlled by Israel since 1967–often depicted vipassanā as essentially Jewish. Indeed, to validate their adoption of insight meditation, many participants first needed to establish their exclusive commitment to orthodox Judaism. Consequently, they culturally appropriated vipassanā, decoupling this practice from “religious” Buddhist elements and instead depicting it as “theirs”. While this appropriation entailed significant dimensions of openness to cultural otherness, including an appreciation of “eastern” expertise in meditation, it would be difficult to characterize it as “cosmopolitan”. Rather, in this case openness ironically depended on, and resulted in deepening, meditators’ belief in the superiority of national-religious Judaism. Thus, far from being identical to openness, cosmopolitan attitudes may actually preclude openness in settings that emphasize an exclusive commitment to a single tradition. Theoretical implications are discussed.
KW - Buddhism
KW - Cosmopolitanism
KW - Israel-Palestine
KW - Judaism
KW - cultural appropriation
KW - insight meditation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85083762114&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/01419870.2019.1640377
DO - 10.1080/01419870.2019.1640377
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85083762114
SN - 0141-9870
VL - 43
SP - 1227
EP - 1245
JO - Ethnic and Racial Studies
JF - Ethnic and Racial Studies
IS - 7
ER -