TY - JOUR
T1 - What is relevance logic?
AU - Avron, Arnon
PY - 2014/1
Y1 - 2014/1
N2 - We suggest two precise abstract definitions of the notion of 'relevance logic' which are both independent of any proof system or semantics. We show that according to the simpler one, R→¬ (the intensional fragment of R) is the minimal relevance logic, but R itself is not. In contrast, R and many other logics are relevance logics according to the second (more complicated) definition, while all fragments of linear logic are not.
AB - We suggest two precise abstract definitions of the notion of 'relevance logic' which are both independent of any proof system or semantics. We show that according to the simpler one, R→¬ (the intensional fragment of R) is the minimal relevance logic, but R itself is not. In contrast, R and many other logics are relevance logics according to the second (more complicated) definition, while all fragments of linear logic are not.
KW - Connectives
KW - Entailment relations
KW - Linear logic
KW - Relevance logics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885293605&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.apal.2013.07.004
DO - 10.1016/j.apal.2013.07.004
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:84885293605
SN - 0168-0072
VL - 165
SP - 26
EP - 48
JO - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic
JF - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic
IS - 1
ER -