Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

What factors empower general practitioners for early cancer diagnosis? A 20-country European Delphi Study

  • George Tzanis
  • , Michael Harris
  • , Mette Brekke
  • , Mercè Marzo-Castillejo
  • , Saliha Serap Cifcili
  • , Wojciech Wawrzynek
  • , Maria Flamm
  • , Nicola Buono
  • , Bernadett Márkus
  • , Galia Zacay
  • , Ilze Skuja
  • , Zlata Ozvacic Adzic
  • , Mihai Iacob
  • , Radost Asenova
  • , Davorina Petek
  • , Krzysztof Buczkowski
  • , Pamela Curtis
  • , Liina Pilv-Toom
  • , Robert Hoffman
  • , Emmanouil Smyrnakis*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
  • University of Exeter
  • University of Bern
  • University of Oslo
  • Fundacio Institut Universitari per A la Recerca A l'Atencio Primaria de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina
  • ICS
  • Marmara University
  • Medical Centre
  • Paracelsus Private Medical University
  • Center for Public Health and Healthcare Research
  • National Society of Medical Education in General Practice (SNaMID)
  • Semmelweis University
  • Meuhedet Health Services
  • Riga Stradins University
  • University of Zagreb
  • Health Centre Zagreb Centar
  • Timis Society of Family Medicine
  • Medical University of Plovdiv
  • University of Ljubljana
  • Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń
  • Close Farm Surgery
  • University of Tartu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Some symptoms are recognised as red flags for cancer, causing the General Practitioner (GP) to refer the patient for investigation without delay. However, many early symptoms of cancer are vague and unspecific, and in these cases, a delay in referral risks a diagnosis of cancer that is too late. Empowering GPs in their management of patients that may have cancer is likely to lead to more timely cancer diagnoses. Aim: To identify the factors that affect European GPs' empowerment in making an early diagnosis of cancer. Methods: This was a Delphi study involving GPs in 20 European countries. We presented GPs with 52 statements representing factors that could empower GPs to increase the number of early cancer diagnoses. Over three Delphi rounds, we asked GPs to indicate the clinical relevance of each statement on a Likert scale. The final list of statements indicated those that were considered by consensus to be the most relevant. Results: In total, 53 GPs from 20 European countries completed the Delphi process, out of the 68 GPs who completed round one. Twelve statements satisfied the pre-defined criteria for relevance. Five of the statements related to screening and four to the primary/secondary care interface. The other selected statements concerned information technology (IT) and GPs' working conditions. Statements relating to training, skills and working efficiency were not considered priority areas. Conclusion: GPs consider that system factors relating to screening, the primary-secondary care interface, IT and their working conditions are key to enhancing their empowerment in patients that could have cancer. These findings provide the basis for seeking actions and policies that will support GPs in their efforts to achieve timely cancer diagnosis.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere76
JournalPrimary Health Care Research and Development
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 25 Nov 2022

Funding

Funders
Hellenic Academic Libraries Link

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • Delphi method
    • Primary Health Care
    • cancer
    • empowerment
    • general practitioners

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'What factors empower general practitioners for early cancer diagnosis? A 20-country European Delphi Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this