TY - JOUR
T1 - Voter Election Frames
T2 - What were the Elections about?
AU - Shamir, Jacob
AU - Shamir, Michal
AU - Lavi, Liron
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Political Studies Association and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2015/12/1
Y1 - 2015/12/1
N2 - How do citizens think about elections? Building on democratic theory, political psychology and political communication theories, we conceptualize how voters interpret elections in terms of election frames, and explore the interplay between them and media frames. Election frames are deduced from the empirical and normative body of work on elections and democracy and they are tracked empirically through in-depth interviews with citizens, carried out during the 2009 parliamentary elections in Israel. The article highlights three major findings. First, all election frames are represented in people's reasoning about elections, but there is considerable variability in their usage, and they are usually applied in rudimentary form. Second, the frames vary over different political contexts. And third, the public does not seem to absorb passively frames from the media, but rather plays an active role in the process of election interpretation, relying on diverse sources. It is proposed in the article that publics' election interpretations are an important aspect of politics that should be placed on political scientists' research agenda.
AB - How do citizens think about elections? Building on democratic theory, political psychology and political communication theories, we conceptualize how voters interpret elections in terms of election frames, and explore the interplay between them and media frames. Election frames are deduced from the empirical and normative body of work on elections and democracy and they are tracked empirically through in-depth interviews with citizens, carried out during the 2009 parliamentary elections in Israel. The article highlights three major findings. First, all election frames are represented in people's reasoning about elections, but there is considerable variability in their usage, and they are usually applied in rudimentary form. Second, the frames vary over different political contexts. And third, the public does not seem to absorb passively frames from the media, but rather plays an active role in the process of election interpretation, relying on diverse sources. It is proposed in the article that publics' election interpretations are an important aspect of politics that should be placed on political scientists' research agenda.
KW - Alienation
KW - Democracy
KW - Election frames
KW - Election interpretation
KW - Frames
KW - Israel
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84956827001&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1467-9248.12145
DO - 10.1111/1467-9248.12145
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:84956827001
SN - 0032-3217
VL - 63
SP - 995
EP - 1013
JO - Political Studies
JF - Political Studies
IS - 5
ER -