Visual screening versus transcutaneous bilirubinometry for predischarge jaundice assessment

Michael Kaplan*, Irena Shchors, Nurit Algur, Ruben Bromiker, Michael S. Schimmel, Cathy Hammerman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: Comparison of visual screening with transcutaneous bilirubinometry (TcB) in identifying neonates with plasma total bilirubin (PTB) ≥75th percentile. Design: In 100 paired readings PTB was 34 ± 24 μmol/L higher than the TcB counterpart. A TcB reading of 154 μmol/L was therefore regarded as equivalent to a PTB of 188 μmol/L, corresponding to the 75th percentile at 48 h. Predischarge, all newborns were evaluated for jaundice, first by visual inspection and then transcutaneously. PTB was ordered as indicated by visual assessment or if the TcB reading was ≥154 μmol/L. Results: Of 346 newborns tested, 25 (7.2%) had a PTB concentration ≥75th percentile. Forty-nine had PTB determinations based on TcB compared with 83 by visual assessment. However, a similar number of affected newborns was identified by each method (21/25 (84%) by visual screening vs. 18/25 (72%) by TcB). PTB concentrations of those who had been chosen by TcB were higher than those selected visually (202 ± 24 μmol/L vs. 186 ± 31 μmol/L). Conclusions: A practical method for predischarge detection of neonates with plasma total bilirubin concentration ≥ 75th percentile, implementing transcutaneous bilirubinometry, is described. The transcutaneous technique required fewer blood tests than visual assessment for similar yield.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)759-763
Number of pages5
JournalActa Paediatrica, International Journal of Paediatrics
Volume97
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2008
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Bilirubin
  • Screening test
  • Transcutaneous bilirubinometry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Visual screening versus transcutaneous bilirubinometry for predischarge jaundice assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this