TY - JOUR
T1 - Visual evoked potentials in the diagnosis of headache before 5 years of age
AU - Lahat, E.
AU - Barr, J.
AU - Barzilai, A.
AU - Cohen, H.
AU - Berkovitch, M.
PY - 1999
Y1 - 1999
N2 - Headache is a common complaint in children. Diagnosis of the type of headache and therapeutic approach is predominantly clinical based on a detailed history and physical examination. These data are often not available or informative in young children with headache, leading clinicians to look for diagnostic studies. We reviewed our experience with 53 children under the age of 5 years with headache. Of these, 42 (75%) children underwent neuro- imaging studies including CT scan (32 cases), MRI (10 cases), or both studies (6 cases). All were within normal limits except for two cases with a small arachnoid cyst and cerebellar hypoplasia respectively which were not directly related to the headache. Visual evoked potentials were performed in all children. There were no significant differences between the mean latencies of N1P100 and N2 of the children with clinically diagnosed migraine, however, the P100-N2 amplitudes of children with migraine were significantly larger compared to those of children without migraine. Even in young children with headache, neuro-imaging studies have a very limited diagnostic value. Visual evoked potentials may also be used in this age group as a diagnostic tool, particularly when clinical symptoms are either unavailable or not characteristic. Conclusion: The diagnosis of migraine in young children remains clinical, based on history obtained from children and parents; however, visual evoked potentials may support the diagnosis in this age group.
AB - Headache is a common complaint in children. Diagnosis of the type of headache and therapeutic approach is predominantly clinical based on a detailed history and physical examination. These data are often not available or informative in young children with headache, leading clinicians to look for diagnostic studies. We reviewed our experience with 53 children under the age of 5 years with headache. Of these, 42 (75%) children underwent neuro- imaging studies including CT scan (32 cases), MRI (10 cases), or both studies (6 cases). All were within normal limits except for two cases with a small arachnoid cyst and cerebellar hypoplasia respectively which were not directly related to the headache. Visual evoked potentials were performed in all children. There were no significant differences between the mean latencies of N1P100 and N2 of the children with clinically diagnosed migraine, however, the P100-N2 amplitudes of children with migraine were significantly larger compared to those of children without migraine. Even in young children with headache, neuro-imaging studies have a very limited diagnostic value. Visual evoked potentials may also be used in this age group as a diagnostic tool, particularly when clinical symptoms are either unavailable or not characteristic. Conclusion: The diagnosis of migraine in young children remains clinical, based on history obtained from children and parents; however, visual evoked potentials may support the diagnosis in this age group.
KW - Headache
KW - Migraine
KW - Visual evoked potentials
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0008799762&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s004310051236
DO - 10.1007/s004310051236
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 10541943
AN - SCOPUS:0008799762
SN - 0340-6199
VL - 158
SP - 892
EP - 895
JO - European Journal of Pediatrics
JF - European Journal of Pediatrics
IS - 11
ER -