Variability of coordination in typically developing children versus children with autism spectrum disorder with and without rhythmic signal

Lidia V. Gabis, Shahar Shefer, Sigal Portnoy*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Motor coordination deficit is a cardinal feature of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The evaluation of coordination of children with ASD is either lengthy, subjective (via observational analysis), or requires cumbersome post analysis. We therefore aimed to use tri-axial accelerometers to compare inter-limb coordination measures between typically developed (TD) children and children ASD, while jumping with and without a rhythmic signal. Children aged 5–6 years were recruited to the ASD group (n = 9) and the TD group (n = 19). Four sensors were strapped to their ankles and wrist and they performed at least eight consecutive jumping jacks twice: at a self-selected rhythm and with a metronome. The primary outcome measures were the timing lag (TL), the timing difference of the maximal acceleration of the left and right limbs, and the lag variability (LV), the variation of TL across the 5 jumps. The LV of the legs of children with ASD was higher compared to the LV of the legs of TD children during self-selected rhythm jumping (p < 0.01). Additionally, the LV of the arms of children with ASD, jumping with the rhythmic signal, was higher compared to that of the TD children (p < 0.05). There were no between-group differences in the TL parameter. Our preliminary findings suggest that the simple protocol presented in this study might allow an objective and accurate quantification of the intra-subject variability of children with ASD via actigraphy.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2769
JournalSensors
Volume20
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 2 May 2020

Keywords

  • Actigraphy
  • Jumping
  • Motor variability
  • Triaxial accelerometers

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Variability of coordination in typically developing children versus children with autism spectrum disorder with and without rhythmic signal'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this