Utility of bile acids in large airway bronchial wash versus bronchoalveolar lavage as biomarkers of microaspiration in lung transplant recipients: a retrospective cohort study

Chen Yang Kevin Zhang, Musawir Ahmed, Ella Huszti, Liran Levy, Sarah E. Hunter, Kristen M. Boonstra, Sajad Moshkelgosha, Andrew T. Sage, Sassan Azad, Rasheed Ghany, Jonathan C. Yeung, Oscar M. Crespin, Lianne G. Singer, Shaf Keshavjee, Tereza Martinu*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is a key tool in respiratory medicine for sampling the distal airways. BAL bile acids are putative biomarkers of pulmonary microaspiration, which is associated with poor outcomes after lung transplantation. Compared to BAL, large airway bronchial wash (LABW) samples the tracheobronchial space where bile acids may be measurable at more clinically relevant levels. We assessed whether LABW bile acids, compared to BAL bile acids, are more strongly associated with poor clinical outcomes in lung transplant recipients. Methods: Concurrently obtained BAL and LABW at 3 months post-transplant from a retrospective cohort of 61 lung transplant recipients were analyzed for taurocholic acid (TCA), glycocholic acid (GCA), and cholic acid by mass spectrometry and 10 inflammatory proteins by multiplex immunoassay. Associations between bile acids with inflammatory proteins and acute lung allograft dysfunction were assessed using Spearman correlation and logistic regression, respectively. Time to chronic lung allograft dysfunction and death were evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards and Kaplan–Meier methods. Results: Most bile acids and inflammatory proteins were higher in LABW than in BAL. LABW bile acids correlated with inflammatory proteins within and between sample type. LABW TCA and GCA were associated with acute lung allograft dysfunction (OR = 1.368; 95%CI = 1.036–1.806; P = 0.027, OR = 1.064; 95%CI = 1.009–1.122; P = 0.022, respectively). No bile acids were associated with chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Adjusted for risk factors, LABW TCA and GCA predicted death (HR = 1.513; 95%CI = 1.014–2.256; P = 0.042, HR = 1.597; 95%CI = 1.078–2.366; P = 0.020, respectively). Patients with LABW TCA in the highest tertile had worse survival compared to all others. Conclusions: LABW bile acids are more strongly associated than BAL bile acids with inflammation, acute lung allograft dysfunction, and death in lung transplant recipients. Collection of LABW may be useful in the evaluation of microaspiration in lung transplantation and other respiratory diseases.

Original languageEnglish
Article number219
JournalRespiratory Research
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Bile acids
  • Biomarkers
  • Bronchoalveolar lavage
  • Large airway bronchial wash
  • Lung transplantation
  • Microaspiration

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Utility of bile acids in large airway bronchial wash versus bronchoalveolar lavage as biomarkers of microaspiration in lung transplant recipients: a retrospective cohort study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this