TY - JOUR
T1 - Using Leading Questions to Reduce Resistance to Innovation
AU - Maaravi, Yossi
AU - Hameiri, Boaz
AU - Gur, Tamar
AU - Heller, Ben
AU - Confino, Dan
AU - Amdor, Hila
AU - Levi, Yuval
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s)
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - Innovation is crucial for organizational success and survival. Yet, organizations often find it difficult to assimilate new ideas as they face internal resistance to change and innovation. Therefore, managers need to implement strategies to reduce such resistance. In two laboratory experiments, we examined the effects of asking leading questions – a powerful means for attitude change – to overcome innovation resistance. We investigate two leading questions strategies, which might lead to self-persuasion: the conventional and the superattitudinal (or paradoxical). The conventional strategy includes leading questions that encourage individuals to respond with statements which are inconsistent with their held views. In contrast, the superattitudinal questions stir individuals to respond with statements consistent with their opinions but more extreme and exaggerated. In the current research, the leading questions prompted answers that relate to resistance to innovation. Both persuasion methods were similarly effective for participants who had relatively low initial levels of resistance to change. However, the conventional strategy was more effective among the more resistant individuals, both when resistance to change was measured (Study 1) and when it was manipulated (Study 2). These are initial indications as to ways to better direct persuasion and attempts to reduce resistance to innovation.
AB - Innovation is crucial for organizational success and survival. Yet, organizations often find it difficult to assimilate new ideas as they face internal resistance to change and innovation. Therefore, managers need to implement strategies to reduce such resistance. In two laboratory experiments, we examined the effects of asking leading questions – a powerful means for attitude change – to overcome innovation resistance. We investigate two leading questions strategies, which might lead to self-persuasion: the conventional and the superattitudinal (or paradoxical). The conventional strategy includes leading questions that encourage individuals to respond with statements which are inconsistent with their held views. In contrast, the superattitudinal questions stir individuals to respond with statements consistent with their opinions but more extreme and exaggerated. In the current research, the leading questions prompted answers that relate to resistance to innovation. Both persuasion methods were similarly effective for participants who had relatively low initial levels of resistance to change. However, the conventional strategy was more effective among the more resistant individuals, both when resistance to change was measured (Study 1) and when it was manipulated (Study 2). These are initial indications as to ways to better direct persuasion and attempts to reduce resistance to innovation.
KW - Attitude change
KW - Innovation
KW - Leading questions
KW - Paradoxical thinking
KW - Persuasion
KW - Resistance to change
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85176928058&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100067
DO - 10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100067
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85176928058
SN - 2713-3745
VL - 33
JO - Journal of Creativity
JF - Journal of Creativity
IS - 3
M1 - 100067
ER -