TY - JOUR
T1 - Use of Machine Learning on Contact Lens Sensor–Derived Parameters for the Diagnosis of Primary Open-angle Glaucoma
AU - Research Consortium
AU - Martin, Keith R.
AU - Mansouri, Kaweh
AU - Weinreb, Robert N.
AU - Wasilewicz, Robert
AU - Gisler, Christophe
AU - Hennebert, Jean
AU - Genoud, Dominique
AU - Shaarawy, Tarek
AU - Erb, Carl
AU - Pfeiffer, Norbert
AU - Trope, Graham E.
AU - Medeiros, Felipe A.
AU - Barkana, Yaniv
AU - Liu, John H.K.
AU - Ritch, Robert
AU - Mermoud, André
AU - Jinapriya, Delan
AU - Birt, Catherine
AU - Ahmed, Iqbal I.
AU - Kranemann, Christoph
AU - Höh, Peter
AU - Lachenmayr, Bernhard
AU - Astakhov, Yuri
AU - Chen, Enping
AU - Duch, Susana
AU - Marchini, Giorgio
AU - Gandolfi, Stefano
AU - Rekas, Marek
AU - Kuroyedov, Alexander
AU - Cernak, Andrej
AU - Polo, Vicente
AU - Belda, José
AU - Grisanti, Swaantje
AU - Baudouin, Christophe
AU - Nordmann, Jean Philippe
AU - De Moraes, Carlos G.
AU - Segal, Zvi
AU - Lusky, Moshe
AU - Morori-Katz, Haia
AU - Geffen, Noa
AU - Kurtz, Shimon
AU - Liu, Ji
AU - Budenz, Donald L.
AU - Knight, O'Rese J.
AU - Mwanza, Jean Claude
AU - Viera, Anthony
AU - Castanera, Fernando
AU - Che-Hamzah, Jemaima
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2018/10
Y1 - 2018/10
N2 - Purpose: To test the hypothesis that contact lens sensor (CLS)-based 24-hour profiles of ocular volume changes contain information complementary to intraocular pressure (IOP) to discriminate between primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and healthy (H) eyes. Design: Development and evaluation of a diagnostic test with machine learning. Methods: SUBJECTS: From 435 subjects (193 healthy and 242 POAG), 136 POAG and 136 age-matched healthy subjects were selected. Subjects with contraindications for CLS wear were excluded. PROCEDURE: This is a pooled analysis of data from 24 prospective clinical studies and a registry. All subjects underwent 24-hour CLS recording on 1 eye. Statistical and physiological CLS parameters were derived from the signal recorded. CLS parameters frequently associated with the presence of POAG were identified using a random forest modeling approach. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) for feature sets including CLS parameters and Start IOP, as well as a feature set with CLS parameters and Start IOP combined. Results: The CLS parameters feature set discriminated POAG from H eyes with mean ROC AUCs of 0.611, confidence interval (CI) 0.493–0.722. Larger values of a given CLS parameter were in general associated with a diagnosis of POAG. The Start IOP feature set discriminated between POAG and H eyes with a mean ROC AUC of 0.681, CI 0.603–0.765. The combined feature set was the best indicator of POAG with an ROC AUC of 0.759, CI 0.654–0.855. This ROC AUC was statistically higher than for CLS parameters or Start IOP feature sets alone (both P <.0001). Conclusions: CLS recordings contain information complementary to IOP that enable discrimination between H and POAG. The feature set combining CLS parameters and Start IOP provide a better indication of the presence of POAG than each of the feature sets separately. As such, the CLS may be a new biomarker for POAG.
AB - Purpose: To test the hypothesis that contact lens sensor (CLS)-based 24-hour profiles of ocular volume changes contain information complementary to intraocular pressure (IOP) to discriminate between primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and healthy (H) eyes. Design: Development and evaluation of a diagnostic test with machine learning. Methods: SUBJECTS: From 435 subjects (193 healthy and 242 POAG), 136 POAG and 136 age-matched healthy subjects were selected. Subjects with contraindications for CLS wear were excluded. PROCEDURE: This is a pooled analysis of data from 24 prospective clinical studies and a registry. All subjects underwent 24-hour CLS recording on 1 eye. Statistical and physiological CLS parameters were derived from the signal recorded. CLS parameters frequently associated with the presence of POAG were identified using a random forest modeling approach. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) for feature sets including CLS parameters and Start IOP, as well as a feature set with CLS parameters and Start IOP combined. Results: The CLS parameters feature set discriminated POAG from H eyes with mean ROC AUCs of 0.611, confidence interval (CI) 0.493–0.722. Larger values of a given CLS parameter were in general associated with a diagnosis of POAG. The Start IOP feature set discriminated between POAG and H eyes with a mean ROC AUC of 0.681, CI 0.603–0.765. The combined feature set was the best indicator of POAG with an ROC AUC of 0.759, CI 0.654–0.855. This ROC AUC was statistically higher than for CLS parameters or Start IOP feature sets alone (both P <.0001). Conclusions: CLS recordings contain information complementary to IOP that enable discrimination between H and POAG. The feature set combining CLS parameters and Start IOP provide a better indication of the presence of POAG than each of the feature sets separately. As such, the CLS may be a new biomarker for POAG.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051248326&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.07.005
DO - 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.07.005
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85051248326
SN - 0002-9394
VL - 194
SP - 46
EP - 53
JO - American Journal of Ophthalmology
JF - American Journal of Ophthalmology
ER -