Urinary tract infection following ritual Jewish circumcision

M. Goldman, J. Barr, T. Bistritzer, M. Aladjem*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Circumcision seems to reduce the overall incidence of urinary tract infections (UTI), although a few studies have suggested that ritual circumcision may be a predisposing factor for UTI within the first 2 weeks following the procedure. The aim of this study was to investigate a possible causal relationship between ritual circumcision and UTI. The study comprised 82 infants with UTI, 55 females and 27 males under the age of 1 year. All males were circumcised on the eighth day of life. The median age of infection was 0.75 and 7.0 months for males and females, respectively. Fifty-two percent (14/27) of UTI episodes were diagnosed within the 2 weeks following circumcision. A significantly lower incidence in Escherichia coli-induced UTI was observed in males compared to females, 67% and 93%, respectively. Similarly, the incidence of E. coli-induced UTI was also significantly lower in males presenting within 2 weeks following circumcision (57%) compared to infants presenting prior or more than 2 weeks following the procedure (92%). Positive blood cultures of an identical microorganism were observed in 6/27 males compared to 2/55 females. The incidence of urinary tract malformations and their severity were similar in both sexes. We conclude that the high incidence of UTI following a ritual Jewish circumcision, as well as the relatively high preponderance of bacteria other than E. coli, may suggest a causal relationship between circumcision and UTI.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1098-1102
Number of pages5
JournalIsrael Journal of Medical Sciences
Volume32
Issue number11
StatePublished - Nov 1996
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Circumcision
  • Neonates
  • Urinary tract infection
  • Young infants

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Urinary tract infection following ritual Jewish circumcision'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this