Unique maximum matching algorithms

Harold N. Gabow*, Haim Kaplan, Robert E. Tarjan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

We consider the problem of testing the uniqueness of maximum matchings, both in the unweighted and in the weighted case. For the unweighted case, we have two results. Given a graph with n vertices and m edges, we can test whether the graph has a unique perfect matching, and find it if it exists, in O(m log4 n) time. This algorithm uses a recent dynamic connectivity algorithm and an old result of Kotzig characterizing unique perfect matchings in terms of bridges. Also, given one perfect matching, we can test for the existence of another in linear time. This algorithm is a modification of Edmonds' blossom-shrinking algorithm implemented using depth-first search. We prove a generalization of Kotzig's theorem characterizing unique f-factors in terms of bridges. This theorem allows us to give a modification of the first algorithm that tests whether a given graph has a unique f-factor, and find it if it exists. We also show how to modify the second algorithm to check whether a given f-factor is unique. Both extensions have the same time bounds as their perfect matching counterparts. For the weighted case, we can test in linear time whether a maximum-weight matching is unique, given the output from Edmonds' algorithm for computing such a matching. The method is an extension of our algorithm for the unweighted case.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)70-78
Number of pages9
JournalConference Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing
DOIs
StatePublished - 1999
Externally publishedYes
EventProceedings of the 1999 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing - FCRC '99 - Atlanta, GA, USA
Duration: 1 May 19994 May 1999

Funding

FundersFunder number
National Science FoundationCCR-9626862

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Unique maximum matching algorithms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this