Abstract
In this review article I examine Michel Tye's recent reassessment of the phenomenal concept strategy. The phenomenal concept strategy is employed in the attempts to respond to the classical arguments that challenge materialism. I examine Tye's reasons for abandoning the phenomenal concept strategy (a strategy that he himself advocated in his earlier writings), and I examine the elements of his new position according to which the materialist response should involve 'singular when filled' content schema, as well as a version of the Russellian distinction between knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description. In the final part I criticize the adequacy of Tye's theory not as a response to the dualists but rather as a response to opponents of representationalism from the materialist camp.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 597-606 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Pragmatics and Cognition |
Volume | 18 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2010 |
Keywords
- Consciousness
- Content schema
- Dualism
- Knowledge by acquaintance
- Materialism
- Perception
- Phenomenal concepts
- The explanatory gap
- The knowledge argument
- The modal argument
- The zombie argument