Two-round and non-interactive concurrent non-malleable commitments from time-lock puzzles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Non-malleable commitments are a fundamental cryptographic tool for preventing (concurrent) man-in-the-middle attacks. Since their invention by Dolev, Dwork, and Naor in 1991, their round-complexity has been extensively studied, leading up to constant-round protocols based on one-way functions (OWFs), and three-round protocols based on sub-exponential OWFs, and standard polynomial-time hardness assumptions such as decisional Diffie-Hellman (DDH) and ZAPs (i.e., two-round witness-indistinguishable proofs). But constructions of two-round, or non-interactive, non-malleable commitments have so far remained elusive; the only known construction relied on a strong and non-falsifiable assumption with a non-malleability flavor. Additionally, a recent result by Pass shows the impossibility of basing two-round non-malleable commitments on falsifiable assumptions using a polynomial-time black-box security reduction. In this work, we show how to overcome this impossibility using super-polynomial-time hardness assumptions. Our main result demonstrates the existence of two-round concurrent non-malleable commitments based on the following four primitives (all with sub-exponential security): (1) non-interactive commitments, (2) ZAPs (i.e., 2-round witness indistinguishable proofs), (3) collision-resistant hash functions, and (4) a ``weak"" time-lock puzzle. Primitives (1), (2), and (3) can be based on, e.g., the discrete log and the RSA assumption. Time-lock puzzles-puzzles that can be solved by ``brute-force"" in time 2t, but cannot be solved significantly faster even using parallel computers-were proposed by Rivest, Shamir, and Wagner in 1996 and have been extensively studied since. We additionally obtain a non-interactive (i.e., one-message) version of our protocol satisfying concurrent non-malleability w.r.t. uniform attackers and show that our non-malleable commitments satisfy an even stronger notion of chosen commitment attack security.

Original languageEnglish
JournalSIAM Journal on Computing
Volume49
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2020
Externally publishedYes

Funding

FundersFunder number
Microsoft New Faculty FellowshipCCF-1214844, CCF-0746990, CNS-1217821
National Science FoundationCNS-1514526, CNS-1528178, CNS-1652849
Air Force Office of Scientific ResearchFA9550-08-1-0197, FA9550-10-1-0093
Army Research OfficeW911NF-15-C-0236
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Bonfils-Stanton Foundation2006317
Air Force Research LaboratoryFA8750-11-2-0211
Government of South Australia

    Keywords

    • Non-interactive
    • Non-malleable commitment
    • Time-lock puzzles
    • Two-message

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Two-round and non-interactive concurrent non-malleable commitments from time-lock puzzles'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this