Two rabbinic inclinations? Rethinking a scholarly dogma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The scholarly consensus on the Rabbinic concept of the yetzer (inclination) takes for granted the existence of two yetzarim, good and evil, in every person. Some have noticed the marginality of the good yetzer in rabbinic discourse, as well as the fact that most sources discuss only one yetzer, but ascribed it to the inherent imbalance of power between the two yetzarim. In this paper I wish to rethink this scholarly consensus, while taking the single-yetzer model, which appears in almost all rabbinic sources, seriously. A systematic analysis of all rabbinic references to the yetzer, which attempts to distinguish as much as possible between sources, both chronologically (early or late), and geographically (Palestinian or Babylonian), yields a picture markedly different from the common view, and helps locate the (rather marginal) place of the two yetzarim in context of the rabbinic corpus in its entirety.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)513-539
Number of pages27
JournalJournal for the Study of Judaism
Volume39
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008

Keywords

  • Anthropology
  • Demonology
  • Duality
  • Inclination
  • Ishmael
  • Mishna
  • Qumran
  • Rabbi
  • Rabbi Akiva
  • Rabbinic
  • Spirits
  • Tannaim
  • Yetzer

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Two rabbinic inclinations? Rethinking a scholarly dogma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this