TY - JOUR
T1 - Two Kinds of Degree-denoting Relatives
T2 - Hebrew versus Romanian
AU - Grosu, Alexander
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2009 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden.
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - This paper conducts a contrastive study of Hebrew and Romanian, with supporting data from additional languages, which pursues both descriptive and theoretical goals. On the descriptive level, it draws attention to a hitherto unnoticed and unanalyzed construction that has so far been detected in Romanian and Albanian only, and which although superfi cially similar to a kind of degree-denoting relative construction that is widely attested cross-linguistically (and thus, in both Hebrew and Romanian), nonetheless diff ers from it in subtle semantic and pragmatic ways, as well as in a more restricted range of expressive options. Observationally, the rare construction diff ers from the more common one in lacking the defi nite determiner that characterizes the latter, and is labeled for this reason 'B(are) D(egree-denoting) R(elative) C(lause) C(onstruction).' On the theoretical level, this paper off ers explicit compositional semantic analyses of the two constructions, which hopefully capture both the similarities and the diff erences between them. Th e constructions are examined against the background of an up-dated variety of the typology of RCCs proposed in Grosu & Landman ( 1998 ).
AB - This paper conducts a contrastive study of Hebrew and Romanian, with supporting data from additional languages, which pursues both descriptive and theoretical goals. On the descriptive level, it draws attention to a hitherto unnoticed and unanalyzed construction that has so far been detected in Romanian and Albanian only, and which although superfi cially similar to a kind of degree-denoting relative construction that is widely attested cross-linguistically (and thus, in both Hebrew and Romanian), nonetheless diff ers from it in subtle semantic and pragmatic ways, as well as in a more restricted range of expressive options. Observationally, the rare construction diff ers from the more common one in lacking the defi nite determiner that characterizes the latter, and is labeled for this reason 'B(are) D(egree-denoting) R(elative) C(lause) C(onstruction).' On the theoretical level, this paper off ers explicit compositional semantic analyses of the two constructions, which hopefully capture both the similarities and the diff erences between them. Th e constructions are examined against the background of an up-dated variety of the typology of RCCs proposed in Grosu & Landman ( 1998 ).
KW - degree
KW - degree relative
KW - maximality/uniqueness
KW - measure unit
KW - restricted individual
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78249239242&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1163/187666309X12491131130620
DO - 10.1163/187666309X12491131130620
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:78249239242
SN - 1876-6633
VL - 1
SP - 176
EP - 203
JO - Brill's Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics
JF - Brill's Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics
IS - 1
ER -