Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Twelve cases of placental chorioangioma: Pregnancy outcome and clinical significance

  • A. Bashiri
  • , B. Furman
  • , O. Erez
  • , A. Wiznitzer
  • , G. Holcberg
  • , M. Mazor*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Soroka Medical Center

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

33 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: To determine perinatal complications and pregnancy outcome in 12 women with chorioangioma of placenta. Study design: During the period between January 1986 and December 1997, 12 women with histologic diagnosis of chorioangioma of placenta who delivered in our institution were studied. Case-control study was designed. Sixty women with histologic examination of the placenta without chorioangioma were randomly identified as control group matched for maternal age and parity. Statistical analyses included t-test, Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test when appropriate. Results: Nine cases (75%) were diagnosed postnatal. The mean gestational age was significantly lower and preterm delivery rate was significantly higher among the chorioangioma group (34 vs. 38.8 weeks P<0.0001; 66% vs. 10%; P<0.001 respectively). Conclusions: Chorioangioma of the placenta, in a high risk population, although small, is associated with significantly higher risk for preterm delivery. This emphasizes the need for pathologic examination of all placentas of patients with preterm delivery.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)53-55
Number of pages3
JournalArchives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Volume266
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Chorioangioma
  • Placenta
  • Pregnancy complications
  • Preterm delivery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Twelve cases of placental chorioangioma: Pregnancy outcome and clinical significance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this