Abstract
The laparoscopic demonstration of a patent tube usually excludes the presence of a tubal pregnancy. In the reported case tubal pregnancy was suspected. Tubal patency was tested because of equivocal laparoscopic findings, and an unexpected tubal pregnancy was diagnosed in the presence of tubal patency.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 265-266 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1976 |
| Externally published | Yes |