Trial of labor after cesarean delivery for pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus

Hadas Ganer Herman*, Zviya Kogan, Jacob Bar, Michal Kovo

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To assess rates of, and factors associated with, trial of labor and vaginal delivery among pregnancies complicated by both gestational diabetes (GDM) and a previous cesarean delivery. Methods: In a retrospective study of singleton deliveries at a university hospital in Israel between 2009 and 2015, women with one previous cesarean delivery and GDM were matched to those without GDM by past cesarean delivery indication: non-favorable (non-progressive labor or failed induction) or favorable (all other indications). Computerized files were reviewed, and maternal, obstetric, and neonatal outcomes were compared. Results: In total, 109 women with GDM were matched to 109 control women. Trial of labor was attempted by 55 (50.5%) women in the control group and 11 (10.1%) in the GDM group (P<0.001). Overall, 42 (38.5%) control women and 5 (4.6%) women with GDM delivered vaginally (P<0.001). Multivariable logistic regression identified lack of GDM as the most significant factor associated with trial of vaginal delivery, followed by a prior vaginal delivery. Among women attempting a trial of labor, past vaginal delivery, but not GDM status, was associated with successful vaginal delivery. Conclusion: GDM significantly diminished the likelihood of a trial of vaginal delivery after cesarean delivery and its subsequent success.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)84-88
Number of pages5
JournalInternational Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Volume138
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2017

Keywords

  • Cesarean delivery
  • Gestational diabetes mellitus
  • Trial of labor
  • Vaginal delivery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Trial of labor after cesarean delivery for pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this