TY - JOUR
T1 - Treatment regimens for optimising outcomes in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration
AU - Teo, Kelvin Yi Chong
AU - Eldem, Bora
AU - Joussen, Antonia
AU - Koh, Adrian
AU - Korobelnik, Jean François
AU - Li, Xiaoxin
AU - Loewenstein, Anat
AU - Lövestam-Adrian, Monica
AU - Navarro, Rafael
AU - Okada, Annabelle A.
AU - Pearce, Ian
AU - Rodríguez, Francisco
AU - Wong, David
AU - Wu, Lihteh
AU - Zur, Dinah
AU - Zarranz-Ventura, Javier
AU - Mitchell, Paul
AU - Chaudhary, Varun
AU - Lanzetta, Paolo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Practice patterns for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) have evolved from the landmark registration trials of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors. Non-monthly regimens like treat-and-extend (T&E) have become popular due to their effectiveness in clinical practice. T&E regimens attempt to limit the burden of visits and treatments by allowing progressively longer treatment intervals, but in so doing, are potentially associated with the expense of treating quiescent disease. This is acceptable to many patients and their ophthalmologists but can still be problematic in the real-world. Recent studies have further refined the T&E approach by allowing for quicker and longer extension of treatment intervals when less severe disease is detected. With newer drugs offering increased durability, a shift to longer regular intervals may emerge as a new practice pattern for VEGF inhibitor therapy. This review aims to consolidate the current literature on the most effective treatment patterns and update treatment guidelines based on options that are now available. It also summarises new aspects of nAMD management that may help to further refine current practice.
AB - Practice patterns for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) have evolved from the landmark registration trials of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors. Non-monthly regimens like treat-and-extend (T&E) have become popular due to their effectiveness in clinical practice. T&E regimens attempt to limit the burden of visits and treatments by allowing progressively longer treatment intervals, but in so doing, are potentially associated with the expense of treating quiescent disease. This is acceptable to many patients and their ophthalmologists but can still be problematic in the real-world. Recent studies have further refined the T&E approach by allowing for quicker and longer extension of treatment intervals when less severe disease is detected. With newer drugs offering increased durability, a shift to longer regular intervals may emerge as a new practice pattern for VEGF inhibitor therapy. This review aims to consolidate the current literature on the most effective treatment patterns and update treatment guidelines based on options that are now available. It also summarises new aspects of nAMD management that may help to further refine current practice.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85205816277&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41433-024-03370-0
DO - 10.1038/s41433-024-03370-0
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.systematicreview???
C2 - 39379523
AN - SCOPUS:85205816277
SN - 0950-222X
JO - Eye (Basingstoke)
JF - Eye (Basingstoke)
ER -