Treatment of severe preeclampsia remote from term: A clinical dilemma

Ariel Many*, Michael J. Kuperminc, David Pausner, Joseph B. Lessing

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Preeclampsia is a major cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Women with severe preeclampsia are usually delivered without delay. In recent years, a new approach in the treatment of women with severe preeclampsia remote from term has been advocated by several investigators worldwide. This approach advocates conservative management in a selected group of women with severe preeclampsia remote from term with the aim of improving perinatal outcome without compromising maternal safety. In most studies, patients who were candidates for conservative management had a blood pressure of more than 160/110, whereas in some studies, women with heavy proteinuria were also considered suitable. Only very few studies have supported conservative management in patients with signs and symptoms of HELLP syndrome. It is imperative to carefully balance maternal and fetal risks before choosing conservative management in severe preeclampsia remote from term. Target Audience: Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Family Physicians. Learning Objectives: After completion of this article, the reader will be able to understand which patients are most likely to benefit from conservative management of severe preeclampsia remote from term, what the conservative management of severe preeclampsia remote from term entails, and what are the benefits of conservative management of preeclampsia remote form term.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)723-727
Number of pages5
JournalObstetrical and Gynecological Survey
Volume54
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1999

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Treatment of severe preeclampsia remote from term: A clinical dilemma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this