TY - JOUR
T1 - Treatment of severe preeclampsia remote from term
T2 - A clinical dilemma
AU - Many, Ariel
AU - Kuperminc, Michael J.
AU - Pausner, David
AU - Lessing, Joseph B.
PY - 1999/11
Y1 - 1999/11
N2 - Preeclampsia is a major cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Women with severe preeclampsia are usually delivered without delay. In recent years, a new approach in the treatment of women with severe preeclampsia remote from term has been advocated by several investigators worldwide. This approach advocates conservative management in a selected group of women with severe preeclampsia remote from term with the aim of improving perinatal outcome without compromising maternal safety. In most studies, patients who were candidates for conservative management had a blood pressure of more than 160/110, whereas in some studies, women with heavy proteinuria were also considered suitable. Only very few studies have supported conservative management in patients with signs and symptoms of HELLP syndrome. It is imperative to carefully balance maternal and fetal risks before choosing conservative management in severe preeclampsia remote from term. Target Audience: Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Family Physicians. Learning Objectives: After completion of this article, the reader will be able to understand which patients are most likely to benefit from conservative management of severe preeclampsia remote from term, what the conservative management of severe preeclampsia remote from term entails, and what are the benefits of conservative management of preeclampsia remote form term.
AB - Preeclampsia is a major cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Women with severe preeclampsia are usually delivered without delay. In recent years, a new approach in the treatment of women with severe preeclampsia remote from term has been advocated by several investigators worldwide. This approach advocates conservative management in a selected group of women with severe preeclampsia remote from term with the aim of improving perinatal outcome without compromising maternal safety. In most studies, patients who were candidates for conservative management had a blood pressure of more than 160/110, whereas in some studies, women with heavy proteinuria were also considered suitable. Only very few studies have supported conservative management in patients with signs and symptoms of HELLP syndrome. It is imperative to carefully balance maternal and fetal risks before choosing conservative management in severe preeclampsia remote from term. Target Audience: Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Family Physicians. Learning Objectives: After completion of this article, the reader will be able to understand which patients are most likely to benefit from conservative management of severe preeclampsia remote from term, what the conservative management of severe preeclampsia remote from term entails, and what are the benefits of conservative management of preeclampsia remote form term.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032756868&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/00006254-199911000-00024
DO - 10.1097/00006254-199911000-00024
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.systematicreview???
AN - SCOPUS:0032756868
SN - 0029-7828
VL - 54
SP - 723
EP - 727
JO - Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey
JF - Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey
IS - 11
ER -