TY - JOUR
T1 - Treatment of peri-implantitis using multiple applications of chlorhexidine chips
T2 - A double-blind, randomized multi-centre clinical trial
AU - Machtei, Eli E.
AU - Frankenthal, Shai
AU - Levi, Guy
AU - Elimelech, Rina
AU - Shoshani, Eyal
AU - Rosenfeld, Olivia
AU - Tagger-Green, Nirit
AU - Shlomi, Benjamin
PY - 2012/12
Y1 - 2012/12
N2 - Background Universal strategies for managing peri-implantitis are yet to be adopted. The aim of this study is to examine a protocol of intensive application of chlorhexidine containing chips in sites with peri-implantitis. Materials and Methods This multi-centre, randomized, double-blind, parallel, two-arm clinical trial included 60 patients (77 implants) with probing depth (PD) 6-10 mm and bone loss ≥2 mm around 1-2 implants. One to two weeks following SRP, baseline measurements were made followed by implants' debridement. Patients were randomized to receive matrix chips (MatrixC) or chlorhexidine Chips (PerioC). Measurements and chips placement were repeated at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 18. At 6 months, patients returned for final examination. Results Probing depth reduction was greater in the PerioC (2.19 ± 0.24 mm) compared with MatrixC (1.59 ± 0.23 mm), p = 0.07. Seventy percentage of the implants in the PerioC and 54% in the MatrixC had PD reduction ≥ 2 mm. Likewise, 40% of the sites (PerioC) and 24% (MatrixC) had PD reduction ≥ 3 mm. Clinical attachment level gains for both groups were significant; however, the changes in the PerioC group were significantly greater than in MatrixC [2.21 ± 0.23 mm. and 1.56 ± 0.25 mm respectively, p = 0.05]. Bleeding on probing was reduced by half in both groups. Conclusion Frequent placement of PerioC and MatrixC together with implants debridement resulted in a substantial improvement in sites with peri-implantitis. Further studies will be required to fully appreciate the mechanism of this treatment.
AB - Background Universal strategies for managing peri-implantitis are yet to be adopted. The aim of this study is to examine a protocol of intensive application of chlorhexidine containing chips in sites with peri-implantitis. Materials and Methods This multi-centre, randomized, double-blind, parallel, two-arm clinical trial included 60 patients (77 implants) with probing depth (PD) 6-10 mm and bone loss ≥2 mm around 1-2 implants. One to two weeks following SRP, baseline measurements were made followed by implants' debridement. Patients were randomized to receive matrix chips (MatrixC) or chlorhexidine Chips (PerioC). Measurements and chips placement were repeated at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 18. At 6 months, patients returned for final examination. Results Probing depth reduction was greater in the PerioC (2.19 ± 0.24 mm) compared with MatrixC (1.59 ± 0.23 mm), p = 0.07. Seventy percentage of the implants in the PerioC and 54% in the MatrixC had PD reduction ≥ 2 mm. Likewise, 40% of the sites (PerioC) and 24% (MatrixC) had PD reduction ≥ 3 mm. Clinical attachment level gains for both groups were significant; however, the changes in the PerioC group were significantly greater than in MatrixC [2.21 ± 0.23 mm. and 1.56 ± 0.25 mm respectively, p = 0.05]. Bleeding on probing was reduced by half in both groups. Conclusion Frequent placement of PerioC and MatrixC together with implants debridement resulted in a substantial improvement in sites with peri-implantitis. Further studies will be required to fully appreciate the mechanism of this treatment.
KW - anti-Inflammatory agents
KW - antimicrobial agents
KW - clinical trial
KW - delayed-action preparations
KW - dental implants
KW - peri-implantitis
KW - therapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84869489537&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jcpe.12006
DO - 10.1111/jcpe.12006
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 23020659
AN - SCOPUS:84869489537
SN - 0303-6979
VL - 39
SP - 1198
EP - 1205
JO - Journal of Clinical Periodontology
JF - Journal of Clinical Periodontology
IS - 12
ER -