TY - JOUR
T1 - Treatment of hydrosalpinx in relation to IVF outcome
T2 - a systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Volodarsky-Perel, Alexander
AU - Buckett, William
AU - Tulandi, Togas
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd.
PY - 2019/9
Y1 - 2019/9
N2 - Salpingectomy is the most widely used treatment for hydrosalpinx. The effect of salpingectomy on the stimulation response during subsequent IVF treatment, however, remains unclear. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the ovarian response and pregnancy outcome of IVF treatment carried out after salpingectomy compared with other pre-IVF treatment options for hydrosalpinx. We conducted a literature search using PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Five randomized studies and nine observational studies were included in the systematic review and evaluated using Cochrane Collaboration's tool for randomized, Newcastle–Ottawa scale for observational studies and GRADE guidelines for certainty of evidence assessment. The mean number of retrieved oocytes was similar between the groups in randomized (mean difference [MD] = –0.03, 95% CI –0.75 to 0.70) and observational studies (MD = –0.15, 95% CI –2.32 to 2.02). Live birth (RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.16), clinical pregnancy (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.57) and implantation rates (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.08) were higher in the salpingectomy group in randomized studies. The present systematic review and meta-analysis showed that salpingectomy does not impair the ovarian response during subsequent IVF treatment.
AB - Salpingectomy is the most widely used treatment for hydrosalpinx. The effect of salpingectomy on the stimulation response during subsequent IVF treatment, however, remains unclear. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the ovarian response and pregnancy outcome of IVF treatment carried out after salpingectomy compared with other pre-IVF treatment options for hydrosalpinx. We conducted a literature search using PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Five randomized studies and nine observational studies were included in the systematic review and evaluated using Cochrane Collaboration's tool for randomized, Newcastle–Ottawa scale for observational studies and GRADE guidelines for certainty of evidence assessment. The mean number of retrieved oocytes was similar between the groups in randomized (mean difference [MD] = –0.03, 95% CI –0.75 to 0.70) and observational studies (MD = –0.15, 95% CI –2.32 to 2.02). Live birth (RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.16), clinical pregnancy (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.57) and implantation rates (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.08) were higher in the salpingectomy group in randomized studies. The present systematic review and meta-analysis showed that salpingectomy does not impair the ovarian response during subsequent IVF treatment.
KW - Hydrosalpinx
KW - Hydrosalpinx aspiration
KW - IVF
KW - Salpingectomy
KW - Sclerotherapy
KW - Tubal occlusion
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068973567&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.04.012
DO - 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.04.012
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.systematicreview???
C2 - 31324437
AN - SCOPUS:85068973567
SN - 1472-6483
VL - 39
SP - 413
EP - 432
JO - Reproductive BioMedicine Online
JF - Reproductive BioMedicine Online
IS - 3
ER -