TY - JOUR
T1 - Transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output measurement using the axillary artery in critically ill patients
AU - Segal, Eran
AU - Katzenelson, Rita
AU - Berkenstadt, Haim
AU - Perel, Azriel
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - Study Objective: To compare cardiac output (CO) as measured by the arterial thermodilution technique using only a central venous catheter and an arterial catheter inserted into the axillary artery, with conventional CO measurement with thermodilution using a pulmonary artery (PA) catheter (PAC). Design: Prospective clinical study in which each patient served as his/her own control. Setting: General ICU of a large tertiary-care teaching hospital. Patients: 22 patients who required invasive hemodynamic monitoring in the ICU. Interventions and Measurements: CO measurements made using the PAC (COpa) were compared to bolus arterial thermodilution measurements (COax). The significance of acute changes in the continuous CO measurements during acute hemodynamic episodes was observed. Main Results: The correlation between the two techniques (COpa and COax) was R2 = 0.82. There was a tendency for 5% overestimation of COpa by the COax. The SEM% (SEM/average CO) for COax and COpa was 2.6% and 3.2%, respectively. The bias between measurements was 0.27 ± 0.67 L/min, and the limits of agreement (mean difference ± 2 SD) from minus 1.07 L/min to 1.63 L/min. Conclusions: In critically ill patients, in whom the measurement of CO is required, arterial thermodilution, using a central vein and the axillary artery is accurate and reproducible.
AB - Study Objective: To compare cardiac output (CO) as measured by the arterial thermodilution technique using only a central venous catheter and an arterial catheter inserted into the axillary artery, with conventional CO measurement with thermodilution using a pulmonary artery (PA) catheter (PAC). Design: Prospective clinical study in which each patient served as his/her own control. Setting: General ICU of a large tertiary-care teaching hospital. Patients: 22 patients who required invasive hemodynamic monitoring in the ICU. Interventions and Measurements: CO measurements made using the PAC (COpa) were compared to bolus arterial thermodilution measurements (COax). The significance of acute changes in the continuous CO measurements during acute hemodynamic episodes was observed. Main Results: The correlation between the two techniques (COpa and COax) was R2 = 0.82. There was a tendency for 5% overestimation of COpa by the COax. The SEM% (SEM/average CO) for COax and COpa was 2.6% and 3.2%, respectively. The bias between measurements was 0.27 ± 0.67 L/min, and the limits of agreement (mean difference ± 2 SD) from minus 1.07 L/min to 1.63 L/min. Conclusions: In critically ill patients, in whom the measurement of CO is required, arterial thermodilution, using a central vein and the axillary artery is accurate and reproducible.
KW - Axillary artery
KW - Cardiac output
KW - Monitoring
KW - Pulmonary artery catheter
KW - Thermodilution
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035987571&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0952-8180(02)00345-8
DO - 10.1016/S0952-8180(02)00345-8
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 12031755
AN - SCOPUS:0035987571
SN - 0952-8180
VL - 14
SP - 210
EP - 213
JO - Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
JF - Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
IS - 3
ER -