Transplant Medicine in China: Need for Transparency and International Scrutiny Remains

T. Trey, A. Sharif, A. Schwarz, M. Fiatarone Singh, J. Lavee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Previous publications have described unethical organ procurement procedures in the People's Republic of China. International awareness and condemnation contributed to the announcement abolishing the procurement of organs from executed prisoners starting from January 2015. Eighteen months after the announcement, and aligned with the upcoming International Congress of the Transplantation Society in Hong Kong, this paper revisits the topic and discusses whether the declared reform has indeed been implemented. China has neither addressed nor included in the reform a pledge to end the procurement of organs from prisoners of conscience, nor has the government initiated any legislative amendments. Recent reports have discussed an implausible discrepancy of officially reported steady annual transplant numbers and a steep expansion of the transplant infrastructure in China. This paper expresses the viewpoint that, in the current context, it is not possible to verify the veracity of the announced changes, and it thus remains premature to include China as an ethical partner in the international transplant community. Until we have independent and objective evidence of a complete cessation of unethical organ procurement from prisoners, the medical community has a professional responsibility to maintain the academic embargo on Chinese transplant professionals.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3115-3120
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Transplantation
Volume16
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Nov 2016

Keywords

  • editorial/personal viewpoint
  • ethics
  • ethics and public policy
  • organ allocation
  • organ procurement
  • organ procurement and allocation
  • organ transplantation in general

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Transplant Medicine in China: Need for Transparency and International Scrutiny Remains'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this