TY - JOUR
T1 - Towards a computerized estimation of visual complexity in images
T2 - Data to assess the association of computed visual complexity features to human responses in visual tasks
AU - Aharonson, Vered
AU - Babshet, Kanaka
AU - Korczyn, Amos
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors
PY - 2020/10
Y1 - 2020/10
N2 - Artificial vision has been extensively studied in the mathematical and computational Sciences. Concurrently, psychological studies attempt to describe visual cognition and the complexity of visual tasks as perceived by humans. The methods and the definitions of vision used by these two disciplines are disjointed. Particularly, an explanation of computer vision performance by human-perceived attributes, if attempted, can only be inferred. This article describes a dataset collected to explore the association between computer-extracted visual attributes and human-perceived attributes in the context of cognitive tasks. The data was acquired from a cohort of 406 subjects, ages 40–90, in the presence of a healthcare professional who assessed that the subjects had no cognitive or motor disorder. The subjects performed computerized cognitive tests which entailed tasks of recognition or recall of an image in a set of three images, presented on the computer screen. The images were simple black and white abstract square shapes. The latencies of the subjects’ responses, by keyboard key press, to each task were logged. The data contains 3 parts: the images presented in each task, described by binary vectors for black and white coding, a response time logged for each task and the subjects’ age, gender, and computer proficiency. A preliminary comparison of computationally-extracted complexity features and subjects’ performance is provided in the article entitled “Linking computerized and perceived attributes of visual complexity” [1].
AB - Artificial vision has been extensively studied in the mathematical and computational Sciences. Concurrently, psychological studies attempt to describe visual cognition and the complexity of visual tasks as perceived by humans. The methods and the definitions of vision used by these two disciplines are disjointed. Particularly, an explanation of computer vision performance by human-perceived attributes, if attempted, can only be inferred. This article describes a dataset collected to explore the association between computer-extracted visual attributes and human-perceived attributes in the context of cognitive tasks. The data was acquired from a cohort of 406 subjects, ages 40–90, in the presence of a healthcare professional who assessed that the subjects had no cognitive or motor disorder. The subjects performed computerized cognitive tests which entailed tasks of recognition or recall of an image in a set of three images, presented on the computer screen. The images were simple black and white abstract square shapes. The latencies of the subjects’ responses, by keyboard key press, to each task were logged. The data contains 3 parts: the images presented in each task, described by binary vectors for black and white coding, a response time logged for each task and the subjects’ age, gender, and computer proficiency. A preliminary comparison of computationally-extracted complexity features and subjects’ performance is provided in the article entitled “Linking computerized and perceived attributes of visual complexity” [1].
KW - Black and white image stimuli
KW - Cognitive tests
KW - Computational attributes
KW - Image feature extraction
KW - Visual complexity
KW - Visual recall
KW - Visual recognition
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089505287&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106108
DO - 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106108
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 32885004
AN - SCOPUS:85089505287
SN - 2352-3409
VL - 32
JO - Data in Brief
JF - Data in Brief
M1 - 106108
ER -