TM and rehabilitation: Another View

Giora Rahav*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

The Abrams and Siegel (1978) evaluation of the Transcendental Meditation program at Folsom prison has been criticized harshly by Allen (1979). Abrams and Siegel's answer to Allen failed to address some of the issues. In a secondary analysis of their data, it is shown that the experimental group indeed fared better than the control groups, although the treatment explains only a small proportion of the variance. The unsolved issues concern mostly (1) the adequacy of the control group and (2) the adequacy of the underlying theory.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)11-17
Number of pages7
JournalCriminal Justice and Behavior
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1980
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'TM and rehabilitation: Another View'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this