Abstract
The Abrams and Siegel (1978) evaluation of the Transcendental Meditation program at Folsom prison has been criticized harshly by Allen (1979). Abrams and Siegel's answer to Allen failed to address some of the issues. In a secondary analysis of their data, it is shown that the experimental group indeed fared better than the control groups, although the treatment explains only a small proportion of the variance. The unsolved issues concern mostly (1) the adequacy of the control group and (2) the adequacy of the underlying theory.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 11-17 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Criminal Justice and Behavior |
Volume | 7 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 1980 |
Externally published | Yes |