Threats to sue and cost divisibility under asymmetric information

Alon Klement*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

The early literature on litigation and settlement assumed that a plaintiff's threat to litigate is credible only when her litigation value-the difference between the expected judgment and her litigation costs-is positive. More recently, however, Bebchuk (1996) has suggested that even if the plaintiff's litigation value is negative, divisibility of her litigation costs may render credibility to her threat to sue. We show that Bebchuk's result is limited to environments where there is relatively little asymmetric information. When a defendant holds private information concerning his liability he can deter small value suits by engaging in a stonewalling strategy, consistently refusing to settle, even if the plaintiff's costs are very finely divided.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)261-272
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Review of Law and Economics
Volume23
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2003
Externally publishedYes

Funding

FundersFunder number
John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics, and Business at Harvard Law School

    Keywords

    • Asymmetric information
    • Defendant
    • Litigation
    • Negative expected value
    • Settlement

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Threats to sue and cost divisibility under asymmetric information'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this