Theory and configurality in clinical judgments of expert and novice psychologists

Yoav Ganzach

doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.954

Theory and configurality in clinical judgments of expert and novice psychologists

Yoav Ganzach^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Coller School of Management

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article shows that in judging the degree of pathology of mental patients, expert psychologists, more than novices, assign heavier weight to the more pathological information. This difference is explained in terms of the professional socialization process of clinical psychologists.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	954-960
Number of pages	7
Journal	Journal of Applied Psychology
Volume	82
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.954
State	Published - Dec 1997

Access to Document

10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.954

Cite this

@article{fa56d37238dc41e59ea1f13c4b2bd4be,

title = "Theory and configurality in clinical judgments of expert and novice psychologists",

abstract = "This article shows that in judging the degree of pathology of mental patients, expert psychologists, more than novices, assign heavier weight to the more pathological information. This difference is explained in terms of the professional socialization process of clinical psychologists.",

author = "Yoav Ganzach",

year = "1997",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.954",

language = "אנגלית",

volume = "82",

pages = "954--960",

journal = "Journal of Applied Psychology",

issn = "0021-9010",

publisher = "American Psychological Association",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Theory and configurality in clinical judgments of expert and novice psychologists

AU - Ganzach, Yoav

PY - 1997/12

Y1 - 1997/12

N2 - This article shows that in judging the degree of pathology of mental patients, expert psychologists, more than novices, assign heavier weight to the more pathological information. This difference is explained in terms of the professional socialization process of clinical psychologists.

AB - This article shows that in judging the degree of pathology of mental patients, expert psychologists, more than novices, assign heavier weight to the more pathological information. This difference is explained in terms of the professional socialization process of clinical psychologists.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0031301208

U2 - 10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.954

DO - 10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.954

M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???

C2 - 9638091

AN - SCOPUS:0031301208

SN - 0021-9010

VL - 82

SP - 954

EP - 960

JO - Journal of Applied Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Psychology

IS - 6

ER -

Theory and configurality in clinical judgments of expert and novice psychologists

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this