Theorizing Provocation Narratives as Communication Strategies

Sandrine Boudana*, Elad Segev

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Despite multiple uses, the concept of provocation is undertheorized and underinvestigated. Theorizing provocation narratives as communication strategies, this article shows that what is at stake in provocations are crucial issues of intentionality, accountability, and blame. While some provocations elicit reactions that are beneficial to the parties involved, others may incite violence. The second part of our study focuses on the latter because of their potential for shifting blame to victims. To deconstruct the mechanism by which provocation introduces this type of bias, we use Labov's method of narrative analysis and apply it to two news items. We conclude on how provocation can serve as a theoretical framework and methodological tool for narrative analysis in many communication contexts and fields.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)329-346
Number of pages18
JournalCommunication Theory
Volume27
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2017

Keywords

  • Bias
  • Blaming
  • Communication Strategy
  • Labov
  • Narrative
  • Provocation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Theorizing Provocation Narratives as Communication Strategies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this