TY - JOUR
T1 - The value-based healthcare approach to haemophilia
T2 - Development of outcome measures for the evaluation of care of people with haemophilia
AU - Cortesi, Paolo Angelo
AU - Fornari, Carla
AU - Conti, Sara
AU - Pollio, Berardino
AU - Boccalandro, Elena
AU - Buzzi, Andrea
AU - Carulli, Christian
AU - Coppola, Antonio
AU - De Cristofaro, Raimondo
AU - Di Minno, Matteo Nicola Dario
AU - Dolan, Gerard
AU - Ferri Grazzi, Enrico
AU - Fornari, Arianna
AU - Gualtierotti, Roberta
AU - Hermans, Cedric
AU - Jiménez-Juste, Victor
AU - Kenet, Gili
AU - Lupi, Angelo
AU - Martinoli, Carlo
AU - Mansueto, Maria Francesca
AU - Nicolò, Gabriella
AU - Tagliaferri, Annarita
AU - Gringeri, Alessandro
AU - Molinari, Angelo Claudio
AU - Mantovani, Lorenzo Giovanni
AU - Castaman, Giancarlo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2024/3
Y1 - 2024/3
N2 - Introduction: Considering the advances in haemophilia management and treatment observed in the last decades, a new set of value-based outcome indicators is needed to assess the quality of care and the impact of these medical innovations. Aim: The Value-Based Healthcare in Haemophilia project aimed to define a set of clinical outcome indicators (COIs) and patient-reported outcome indicators (PROIs) to assess quality of care in haemophilia in high-income countries with a value-based approach to inform and guide the decision-making process. Methods: A Value-based healthcare approach based on the available literature, current guidelines and the involvement of a multidisciplinary group of experts was applied to generate a set of indicators to assess the quality of care of haemophilia. Results: A final list of three COIs and five PROIs was created and validated. The identified COIs focus on two domains: musculoskeletal health and function, and safety. The identified PROIs cover five domains: bleeding frequency, pain, mobility and physical activities, Health-Related Quality of Life and satisfaction. Finally, two composite outcomes, one based on COIs, and one based on PROIs, were proposed as synthetic outcome indicators of quality of care. Conclusion: The presented standard set of health outcome indicators provides the basis for harmonised longitudinal and cross-sectional monitoring and comparison. The implementation of this value-based approach would enable a more robust assessment of quality of care in haemophilia, within a framework of continuous treatment improvements with potential added value for patients. Moreover, proposed COIs and PROIs should be reviewed and updated routinely.
AB - Introduction: Considering the advances in haemophilia management and treatment observed in the last decades, a new set of value-based outcome indicators is needed to assess the quality of care and the impact of these medical innovations. Aim: The Value-Based Healthcare in Haemophilia project aimed to define a set of clinical outcome indicators (COIs) and patient-reported outcome indicators (PROIs) to assess quality of care in haemophilia in high-income countries with a value-based approach to inform and guide the decision-making process. Methods: A Value-based healthcare approach based on the available literature, current guidelines and the involvement of a multidisciplinary group of experts was applied to generate a set of indicators to assess the quality of care of haemophilia. Results: A final list of three COIs and five PROIs was created and validated. The identified COIs focus on two domains: musculoskeletal health and function, and safety. The identified PROIs cover five domains: bleeding frequency, pain, mobility and physical activities, Health-Related Quality of Life and satisfaction. Finally, two composite outcomes, one based on COIs, and one based on PROIs, were proposed as synthetic outcome indicators of quality of care. Conclusion: The presented standard set of health outcome indicators provides the basis for harmonised longitudinal and cross-sectional monitoring and comparison. The implementation of this value-based approach would enable a more robust assessment of quality of care in haemophilia, within a framework of continuous treatment improvements with potential added value for patients. Moreover, proposed COIs and PROIs should be reviewed and updated routinely.
KW - haemophilia
KW - outcome assessment
KW - patient reported outcome measures
KW - quality indicators
KW - treatment outcome
KW - value-based purchasing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85184272541&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/hae.14943
DO - 10.1111/hae.14943
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 38314918
AN - SCOPUS:85184272541
SN - 1351-8216
VL - 30
SP - 437
EP - 448
JO - Haemophilia
JF - Haemophilia
IS - 2
ER -