TY - JOUR
T1 - The Utility of Early Postoperative Neuroimaging in Elective/Semielective Craniotomy Patients
T2 - A Single-Arm Prospective Trial
AU - Ben Zvi, Ido
AU - Matsri, Sher
AU - Felzensztein, David
AU - Yassin, Saeed
AU - Orlev, Alon
AU - Ben Shalom, Netanel
AU - Gavrielli, Shlomo
AU - Inbar, Edna
AU - Loeub, Adam
AU - Schwartz, Noa
AU - Rajz, Gustavo
AU - Novitsky, Ivan
AU - Kanner, Andrew
AU - Berkowitz, Shani
AU - Harnof, Sagi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2020/6
Y1 - 2020/6
N2 - Background: The necessity and timing of early postoperative imaging (POI) are debated in many studies. Despite the consensus that early POI does not change patient management, these examinations are routinely performed. This is the first prospective study related to POI. Our aims were to assess the necessity of early POI in asymptomatic patients and to verify accuracy of the presented algorithm. Methods: This was an algorithm-based prospective single-center study. The algorithm addressed preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative considerations, including estimated pathology type, device placement, and postoperative neurologic change. Early computed tomography scans were obtained in all patients, but if postoperative algorithm indications did not recommend a scan, the treating team was blinded to them, and patient management was conducted based on clinical examinations alone. A neuroradiologist and study-independent neurosurgeon reviewed all the scans. Results: Of 103 enrolled patients, 88 remained asymptomatic, and 15 experienced symptoms postoperatively. Pathology was present on POI in 1% of the asymptomatic patients and 53% of the symptomatic patients (P < 0.001). In the asymptomatic group, no treatment modifications were made postoperatively. Blinding of the surgical team was not removed, and 20% of the symptomatic patients returned to the operating room because of imaging and neurologic findings. The goal of <5% algorithm failure was reached with statistical significance. Conclusions: In asymptomatic postoperative patients in whom early imaging is not performed for oncologic indications, device placement verification, or similar reasons, POI is unnecessary and does not change the management of these patients.
AB - Background: The necessity and timing of early postoperative imaging (POI) are debated in many studies. Despite the consensus that early POI does not change patient management, these examinations are routinely performed. This is the first prospective study related to POI. Our aims were to assess the necessity of early POI in asymptomatic patients and to verify accuracy of the presented algorithm. Methods: This was an algorithm-based prospective single-center study. The algorithm addressed preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative considerations, including estimated pathology type, device placement, and postoperative neurologic change. Early computed tomography scans were obtained in all patients, but if postoperative algorithm indications did not recommend a scan, the treating team was blinded to them, and patient management was conducted based on clinical examinations alone. A neuroradiologist and study-independent neurosurgeon reviewed all the scans. Results: Of 103 enrolled patients, 88 remained asymptomatic, and 15 experienced symptoms postoperatively. Pathology was present on POI in 1% of the asymptomatic patients and 53% of the symptomatic patients (P < 0.001). In the asymptomatic group, no treatment modifications were made postoperatively. Blinding of the surgical team was not removed, and 20% of the symptomatic patients returned to the operating room because of imaging and neurologic findings. The goal of <5% algorithm failure was reached with statistical significance. Conclusions: In asymptomatic postoperative patients in whom early imaging is not performed for oncologic indications, device placement verification, or similar reasons, POI is unnecessary and does not change the management of these patients.
KW - Postoperative imaging
KW - Postoperative management
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082442704&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.02.130
DO - 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.02.130
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 32145412
AN - SCOPUS:85082442704
SN - 1878-8750
VL - 138
SP - e381-e388
JO - World Neurosurgery
JF - World Neurosurgery
ER -