The Sphygmomanometer Pain Test: A Simple Method for Identifying Patients at Risk of Excessive Pain after Total knee Arthroplasty

Yaron Bar Ziv, Shai Shemesh, Gabriel Agar, Shaike Benedict, Snir Heller*, Yona Kosashvili

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Despite the overall success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), a relatively large proportion of patients remain dissatisfied with the outcome. We hypothesized that patients with a lower threshold for pain were more likely to have worse outcomes after TKA. Methods: Forty-eight consecutive patients with primary knee osteoarthritis graded a standardized painful stimulus caused by inflating a sphygmomanometer placed on the forearm, on a visual analog scale (VAS) scale before their TKA. We compared the VAS scores to patients' Knee Society scores and Knee Society function scores 2 years after TKA. Results: Patients with a severe VAS score (>74 mm) had significantly worse Knee Society scores compared to patients with mild (0-44 mm) and moderate (45-74 mm) VAS scores (55 ± 20.5 vs 81.5 ± 11.1 and 84.8 ± 13, respectively, P =.04) and worse Knee Society Function scores (34 ± 20.7 vs 75.2 ± 17.3 and 77 ± 17.4, respectively, P =.027) at 2 years after TKA. Conclusions: Patients with a lower threshold for pain, as determined by a standardized painful stimulus, are more likely to have lower Knee Society pain and function scores after TKA.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)798-801
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Arthroplasty
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Apr 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Catastrophizing pain
  • Functional score
  • Patient satisfaction
  • Total knee arthroplasty
  • Visual analog scale

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Sphygmomanometer Pain Test: A Simple Method for Identifying Patients at Risk of Excessive Pain after Total knee Arthroplasty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this