Abstract
According to the radical sceptic we have no reason to believe anything, being unable even to distinguish the more probable from the less. I propose to consider the practical problems engendered by this stance. It seems to require that we suspend judgement, but it is not clear that we can acquiesce to this demand. Is it psychologically possible to suspend belief? And if it is, can the sceptic live and act without believing? The practical difficulties, I shall argue, are genuine (although not always properly understood), but do not absolve us from the need to contend with sceptical arguments.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 225-234 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Dialectica |
Volume | 50 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1996 |