TY - JOUR
T1 - The role of response elements organization in transcription factor selectivity
T2 - The ifn-β enhanceosome example
AU - Pan, Yongping
AU - Nussinov, Ruth
PY - 2011/6
Y1 - 2011/6
N2 - What is the mechanism through which transcription factors (TFs) assemble specifically along the enhancer DNA? The IFN-benhanceosome provides a good model system: it is small; its components' crystal structures are available; and there are biochemical and cellular data. In the IFN-b enhanceosome, there are few protein-protein interactions even though consecutive DNA response elements (REs) overlap. Our molecular dynamics (MD) simulations on different motif combinations from the enhanceosome illustrate that cooperativity is achieved via unique organization of the REs: specific binding of one TF can enhance the binding of another TF to a neighboring RE and restrict others, through overlap of REs; the order of the REs can determine which complexes will form; and the alternation of consensus and non-consensus REs can regulate binding specificity by optimizing the interactions among partners. Our observations offer an explanation of how specificity and cooperativity can be attained despite the limited interactions between neighboring TFs on the enhancer DNA. To date, when addressing selective TF binding, attention has largely focused on RE sequences. Yet, the order of the REs on the DNA and the length of the spacers between them can be a key factor in specific combinatorial assembly of the TFs on the enhancer and thus in function. Our results emphasize cooperativity via RE binding sites organization.
AB - What is the mechanism through which transcription factors (TFs) assemble specifically along the enhancer DNA? The IFN-benhanceosome provides a good model system: it is small; its components' crystal structures are available; and there are biochemical and cellular data. In the IFN-b enhanceosome, there are few protein-protein interactions even though consecutive DNA response elements (REs) overlap. Our molecular dynamics (MD) simulations on different motif combinations from the enhanceosome illustrate that cooperativity is achieved via unique organization of the REs: specific binding of one TF can enhance the binding of another TF to a neighboring RE and restrict others, through overlap of REs; the order of the REs can determine which complexes will form; and the alternation of consensus and non-consensus REs can regulate binding specificity by optimizing the interactions among partners. Our observations offer an explanation of how specificity and cooperativity can be attained despite the limited interactions between neighboring TFs on the enhancer DNA. To date, when addressing selective TF binding, attention has largely focused on RE sequences. Yet, the order of the REs on the DNA and the length of the spacers between them can be a key factor in specific combinatorial assembly of the TFs on the enhancer and thus in function. Our results emphasize cooperativity via RE binding sites organization.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959856940&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002077
DO - 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002077
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:79959856940
SN - 1553-734X
VL - 7
JO - PLoS Computational Biology
JF - PLoS Computational Biology
IS - 6
M1 - e1002077
ER -