The role of person versus situation in life satisfaction: A critical examination

Daniel Heller*, Remus Ilies, David Watson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Two main theoretical approaches have been put forward to explain individual differences in life satisfaction: top-down (i.e., personological) and bottom-up (i.e., situational). The authors examine the relative merit of these 2 approaches and the psychological processes underlying top-down models. Consistent with a top-down approach, meta-analytic findings indicate that Neuroticism, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness are related to both various domain satisfactions and life satisfaction; however, consistent with a bottom-up approach, domain satisfactions are strongly linked to life satisfaction but only weakly linked to each other. Path analyses based on meta-analytic estimates did not support a simple "direct-effects" top-down model but supported both (a) a temperament-based top-down model and (b) an integrative model that incorporates the direct influence of domain satisfactions on life satisfaction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)574-600
Number of pages27
JournalPsychological Bulletin
Volume130
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The role of person versus situation in life satisfaction: A critical examination'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this