TY - JOUR
T1 - The role of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and sudden cardiac death prevention
T2 - Indications, device selection, and outcome
AU - Goldenberg, Ilan
AU - Huang, David T.
AU - Nielsen, Jens Cosedis
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/6/1
Y1 - 2020/6/1
N2 - Multiple randomized multicentre clinical trials have established the role of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) as the mainstay in the treatment of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD) prevention. These trials have focused mainly on heart failure patients with advanced left ventricular dysfunction and were mostly conducted two decades ago, whereas a more recent trial has provided conflicting results. Therefore, much remains to be determined on how best to balance the identification of patients at high risk of SCD together with who would benefit most from ICD implantation in a contemporary setting. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators have also evolved from the simple, defibrillation-only devices implanted surgically to more advanced technologies of multi-chamber devices, with physiologic bradycardic pacing, including cardiac resynchronization therapy, atrial and ventricular therapeutic pacing algorithms, and subcutaneous ICDs. These multiple options necessitate individualized approach to device selection and programming. This review will focus on the current knowledge on selection of patients for ICD treatment, device selection and programming, and future directions of implantable device therapy for SCD prevention.
AB - Multiple randomized multicentre clinical trials have established the role of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) as the mainstay in the treatment of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD) prevention. These trials have focused mainly on heart failure patients with advanced left ventricular dysfunction and were mostly conducted two decades ago, whereas a more recent trial has provided conflicting results. Therefore, much remains to be determined on how best to balance the identification of patients at high risk of SCD together with who would benefit most from ICD implantation in a contemporary setting. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators have also evolved from the simple, defibrillation-only devices implanted surgically to more advanced technologies of multi-chamber devices, with physiologic bradycardic pacing, including cardiac resynchronization therapy, atrial and ventricular therapeutic pacing algorithms, and subcutaneous ICDs. These multiple options necessitate individualized approach to device selection and programming. This review will focus on the current knowledge on selection of patients for ICD treatment, device selection and programming, and future directions of implantable device therapy for SCD prevention.
KW - ICD
KW - Primary prevention
KW - Sudden cardiac death
KW - Ventricular tachyarrhymias
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085714210&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz788
DO - 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz788
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.systematicreview???
C2 - 31713598
AN - SCOPUS:85085714210
VL - 41
SP - 2003
EP - 2011
JO - European Heart Journal
JF - European Heart Journal
SN - 0195-668X
IS - 21
ER -