The role of human-related risk in breeding site selection by wolves

Víctor Sazatornil, Alejandro Rodríguez, Michael Klaczek, Mohsen Ahmadi, Francisco Álvares, Stephen Arthur, Juan Carlos Blanco, Bridget L. Borg, Dean Cluff, Yolanda Cortés, Emilio J. García, Eli Geffen, Bilal Habib, Yorgos Iliopoulos, Mohammad Kaboli, Miha Krofel, Luis Llaneza, Francesca Marucco, John K. Oakleaf, David K. PersonHubert Potočnik, Nina Ražen, Helena Rio-Maior, Håkan Sand, David Unger, Petter Wabakken, José Vicente López-Bao*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

80 Scopus citations

Abstract

Large carnivores can be found in different scenarios of cohabitation with humans. Behavioral adaptations to minimize risk from humans are expected to be exacerbated where large carnivores are most vulnerable, such as at breeding sites. Using wolves as a model species, along with data from 26 study areas across the species' worldwide range, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the role of humans in breeding site selection by a large carnivore. Some of the patterns previously observed at the local scale become extrapolatable to the entire species range provided that important sources of variation are taken into account. Generally, wolves minimised the risk of exposure at breeding sites by avoiding human-made structures, selecting shelter from vegetation and avoiding agricultural lands. Our results suggest a scaled hierarchical habitat selection process across selection orders by which wolves compensate higher exposure risk to humans within their territories via a stronger selection at breeding sites. Dissimilar patterns between continents suggest that adaptations to cope with human-associated risks are modulated by the history of coexistence and persecution. Although many large carnivores persisting in human-dominated landscapes do not require large-scale habitat preservation, habitat selection at levels below occupancy and territory should be regarded in management and conservation strategies aiming to preserve these species in such contexts. In this case, we recommend providing shelter from human interference at least in small portions of land in order to fulfill the requirements of the species to locate their breeding sites.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)103-110
Number of pages8
JournalBiological Conservation
Volume201
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2016

Funding

FundersFunder number
Mexican Wolf Recovery Program
Picos de Europa National Park
Progetto Lupo Piemonte
Regional Government of Maharastra
Slovenian Ministry of Agriculture and EnvironmentLIFE08/NAT/SLO/000244
USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Services–Wildlife ServicesJCI-2012-13066
University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point
Wisconsin Departments of Natural Resources and Transportation
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Massachusetts Department of Fish and Game
U.S. Forest Service
National Park Service
University of Northern British Columbia
European Commission
Ministerio de Economía y CompetitividadSEV-2012-0262
Department of Agriculture, Australian Government
Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RSP4-0059
Xunta de Galicia

    Keywords

    • Continental patterns
    • Homesites
    • Human population density
    • Human-dominated landscapes
    • Human-made structures
    • Large carnivores
    • Persecution
    • Persistence

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The role of human-related risk in breeding site selection by wolves'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this