@article{4152a7714b4646d2b8530424ed881da8,
title = "The retrospective independence of positive and negative affect",
abstract = "We examine independence in retrospective evaluations of positive and negative affect (PA and NA, respectively). Study 1 shows that the estimation of weekly PA and NA frequencies depends on the congruent daily affects but not on the incongruent daily affects (i.e., weekly PA [NA] depends on the daily PAs [NAs], but not on the daily NAs [PAs]). Study 2 replicates and extends the results of Study 1 by using a within- and between-subjects design as well as both frequency and intensity measures of affect, and by also examining the relationship between momentary and daily affect. Study 3 shows that daily PA and NA are affected by the existence of subjectively defined congruent peak affect and less by subjectively defined incongruent peak affect. We suggest a focusing bias account, according to which asking about positive [negative] affect focuses attention on positive [negative] experiences.",
keywords = "Dimensionality of affect, Peak-end models, Positive and negative affect",
author = "Yoav Ganzach and Einat Yaor and Shatz, {Talya Miron} and Ben Bulmash and Doron Greenberg",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 Guilford Publications, Inc.",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1521/SOCO.2020.38.5.470",
language = "אנגלית",
volume = "38",
pages = "470--488",
journal = "Social Cognition",
issn = "0278-016X",
publisher = "Guilford Publications",
number = "5",
}