The relative importance of project success dimensions

Stan Lipovetsky*, Asher Tishler, Dov Dvir, Aaron Shenhar

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Traditionally, the success of a project is assessed using internal measures such as technical and operational goals, and meeting schedule and budget. More recently, it has been recognized that several other measures should be used to define project success. These measures reflect external effectiveness: the project's impact on its customers, and on the developing organization itself. In our study of 110 defense projects performed by Israeli industry, we used a multidimensional approach to measure the success of defense projects. Based on previous studies, we defined four dimensions of success: meeting design goals; benefits to the customer; benefits to the developing organization; and benefits to the defense and national infrastructure. For each project, we asked three different stakeholders (the customer, the developing organization, and the coordinating office within the Ministry of Defense) for their views on the relative importance of these dimensions of success. Analysis of the data revealed that the dimension benefits to the customer is by far the most important success dimension. The second in importance is meeting design goals. The other two dimensions are relatively unimportant.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)97-106
Number of pages10
JournalR and D Management
Issue number2
StatePublished - Apr 1997


Dive into the research topics of 'The relative importance of project success dimensions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this