Abstract
I begin by making some distinctions between kinds of response to a skeptical claim, the purpose of which is to explain what I mean by a "dissolution" of the problem of induction, and to focus on one of the ways it can be implemented. I then argue that previous attempts to dissolve the problem in this way fail, present mine, and defend it. Finally, I show that (disappointingly) the dissolution of the problem doesn't improve our nonnative situation and may even worsen it.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 69-83 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | American Philosophical Quarterly |
| Volume | 53 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| State | Published - Jan 2016 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The problem of induction dissolved; but are we better-off?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver