TY - JOUR
T1 - The outcome of local excision of large rectal polyps by transanal endoscopic microsurgery
AU - Shaltiel, Tali
AU - Gingold-Belfer, Rachel
AU - Kirshtein, Boris
AU - Issa, Nidal
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/4
Y1 - 2023/4
N2 - Introduction: Local excision of large rectal polyps can be an alternative for radical rectal resection with total mesorectal excision. We aim to report the functional and oncological outcomes of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) for patients with large rectal polyps. Methods: All demographic and clinical data of patients who underwent TEM for rectal polyp of 5 cm or more at the Hasharon Hospital from 2005 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Results: Twenty-eight patients were included. The mean age was 66 years. The mean polyp size was 6.2 cm (range: 5-8.5 cm) with a mean distance of 8.3 cm from the anal verge. Peritoneal entry during TEM was observed in five patients and additional laparoscopy after the completion of the TEM was performed in four patients. There were no major perioperative complications. Seven patients had minor complications. Final pathology revealed T1 carcinoma in five patients and T2 carcinoma in three patients. Re-TEM was performed in one patient with involved margins with adenoma. After a median follow-up of 64 months, one patient had local recurrence. Conclusion: TEM is an acceptable technique for the treatment of large polyps with minor complications and a reasonable recurrence rate. TEM may be considered regardless of the size of the rectal polyp.
AB - Introduction: Local excision of large rectal polyps can be an alternative for radical rectal resection with total mesorectal excision. We aim to report the functional and oncological outcomes of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) for patients with large rectal polyps. Methods: All demographic and clinical data of patients who underwent TEM for rectal polyp of 5 cm or more at the Hasharon Hospital from 2005 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Results: Twenty-eight patients were included. The mean age was 66 years. The mean polyp size was 6.2 cm (range: 5-8.5 cm) with a mean distance of 8.3 cm from the anal verge. Peritoneal entry during TEM was observed in five patients and additional laparoscopy after the completion of the TEM was performed in four patients. There were no major perioperative complications. Seven patients had minor complications. Final pathology revealed T1 carcinoma in five patients and T2 carcinoma in three patients. Re-TEM was performed in one patient with involved margins with adenoma. After a median follow-up of 64 months, one patient had local recurrence. Conclusion: TEM is an acceptable technique for the treatment of large polyps with minor complications and a reasonable recurrence rate. TEM may be considered regardless of the size of the rectal polyp.
KW - Long-term outcome
KW - pre-operative complications
KW - rectal surgery
KW - transanal endoscopic microsurgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85158909940&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4103/jmas.jmas_147_22
DO - 10.4103/jmas.jmas_147_22
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 36124472
AN - SCOPUS:85158909940
SN - 0972-9941
VL - 19
SP - 282
EP - 287
JO - Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
JF - Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
IS - 2
ER -