Abstract
I argue that the French sociologist Émile Durkheim (1858–1917) decided to constitute sociology, a novel field, as ‘scientific’ early in his career. He adopted evolutionized biology as then practiced as his principal model of science, but at first wavered between alternative repertoires of concepts, models, metaphors and analogies, in particular Spencerian Lamarckism and French neo-Lamarckism. I show how Durkheim came to fashion a particular deployment of the French neo-Lamarckian repertoire. The paper describes and analyzes this repertoire and explicates how it might have been available to a non-biologist. I analyze Durkheim’s very early writings between 1882 and 1892 in this context to substantiate my argument.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 153-190 |
| Number of pages | 38 |
| Journal | Journal of the History of Biology |
| Volume | 56 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2023 |
Funding
| Funders |
|---|
| Karen Rader and Marsha Richmond |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Keywords
- Durkheim
- French neo-Lamarckism
- Social
- Sociology
- Transformism
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Neo-Lamarckian Tools Deployed by the Young Durkheim: 1882–1892'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver